A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Neuromodulation Using 'ExAblate 4000 Type 2.1' in Patients With Psychostimulant Use Disorder(PUD)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age19-60
SponsorKorea University Anam Hospital

About this trial

The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the initial safety and efficacy of the ExAblate Model 4000 Type 2.1 surgical device for nucleus accumbens (NAc) neuromodulation in patients with psychostimulant use disorder (PUD).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults between the ages of 19 and 60

Subject is diagnosed with a DSM-5 psychostimulant* use disorder (PUD) by a board certified psychiatrist.

Subject is currently receiving standard substance use disorder inpatient treatment or an intensive outpatient program

Subject has been off psychostimulants and other illicit drugs, confirmed via urine toxicology screen

Disqualifiers

Subject with standard contraindication for MR imaging, such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices.

Subject with known allergies to the MRI contrast agent gadolinium (Gadovist®) or contraindication (such as untreated hypokalemia).

Subject who are unable or unwilling to tolerate the required prolonged stationary position during treatment (approximately 2-3 hours)

More than 30% of the skull area traversed by the sonication pathyway is covered by scars, scalp disorder (e.g., eczema), or atrophy of the scalp.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • ExAblate 4000 Type 2.1

    Device

    In Sham+Active arm, the subject will receive sham device application(Visit 2-1) and then active device application(Visit 2-2) after 7±2 days. In Active arm, the subject will receive active device application(Visit 2) Subjects will return to the site at Visit 3 (7±2 days post-active device application), Visit 4 (30±7 days post-active device application), Visit 5 (90±7 days post-active device application), and Visit 6 (180±7 days post-active device application) for safety and efficacy assessments.

Treatment groups

10 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Active arm:Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Sham+Active armSham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Success rate of psychostimulant abstinence (%)

Percentage of subjects with no detectable psychostimulants and other illicit drugs by urine toxicology screening after application

Time frame
7, 30, 90, and 180 days after ACTIVE device application

Secondary outcomes

1

Time to recurrence (in days)

Mean time to relapse for subjects with psychostimulants and other illicit drugs detected by urine toxicology screening after application of the ACTIVE device

Time frame
6 months
2

Visual Analog Scale rating of craving severity (mm)

Change in substance craving visual analog scale (VAS, 0\~100mm) score after sham or active device application. 0 indicates no craving at all, while 100 indicates the maximum craving.

Time frame
Baseline to 7 days after SHAM device application, baseline to 7, 30, 90, and 180 days post ACTIVE device
3

Assessments related to mood/anxiety/attention/impulsivity

Change (in points) in assessments of mood/anxiety/attention/impulsivity

Time frame
Baseline to 7 days after SHAM device application, baseline to 7, 30, 90, and 180 days post ACTIVE device
4

Assessment of cognitive function

Change in Cognitive Function Assessment (points) Post-ACTIVE Device application

Time frame
Baseline to 180 days post-ACTIVE Device application

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.