About this trial
Some of titanium's drawbacks that is commonly used in maxillofacial surgery included scatter artefacts on regular imaging, implant exposure and inflammation, high thermal conductivity, and high elastic modulus. Very few clinical studies have been published on using a PEEK plate in the mandibular fractures and to the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first study that will be done comparing trapezoidal condylar 3D printed PEEK plates and titanium trapezoidal condylar plate in subcondylar fractures in terms of clinical and radiographical outcomes.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients aged 18 years or older, irrespective of gender
Recent mandibular subcondylar fractures indicated for open reduction and internal fixation
Disqualifiers
Medically compromised patients contradicting operation (ASA III, IV & V).
Patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
Infection at the fracture line.
Pathological fractures and old fractures
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
titanium trapezoidal plates
Other interventionORIF subcondylar fracture using trapezoidal titanium plates
PEEK trapezoidal plates
Other interventionORIF subcondylar fracture using trapezoidal PEEK plates
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Maximum mouth opening
Maximum mouth opening is the distance between the incisal edges of the upper and lower central incisors at the midline when the mouth is opened as wide as possible without pain. It will be measured in millimeters (mm) using a caliper
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: