[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100557730":3},{"organization":4,"outcomesModule":7,"designInfo":23,"detailedDescription":31,"studyPopulation":22,"armGroups":32,"interventions":45,"overallOfficials":22,"centralContacts":55,"locations":65,"responsibleParty":85,"collaborators":22,"id":87,"slug":22,"hasResults":88,"nctId":89,"briefTitle":90,"officialTitle":91,"acronym":22,"eligibilityCriteria":92,"healthyVolunteers":93,"sex":94,"minAge":95,"maxAge":22,"enrollmentInfo":96,"targetDuration":22,"studyType":99,"phases":100,"briefSummary":102,"conditions":103,"keywords":105,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":22,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":107,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":108,"startDateStruct":111,"completionDateStruct":113,"leadSponsor":115,"locationsCount":116},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital","OTHER",{"primaryOutcomes":8,"secondaryOutcomes":13,"otherOutcomes":22},[9],{"measure":10,"description":11,"timeFrame":12},"Implant stability using Resonance Frequency Analysis","to measure primary and secondary stability","\"Immediately after Post-operative\", \"1 month\", \"3 months\"",[14,18],{"measure":15,"description":16,"timeFrame":17},"Marginal bone loss using RVG with grid","to measure marginal bone level","\"Immediately after Post-operative\", 3 months",{"measure":19,"description":20,"timeFrame":21},"Soft tissue healing","soft tissue healing to be assessed using Landry Turnbull and Howley Healing Index. Soft tissue healing will be scored from 1 to 5, where score 1 is very poor and 5 is excellent.","1 week, 1 month, 3 months.",null,{"allocation":24,"interventionModel":25,"interventionModelDescription":22,"primaryPurpose":26,"observationalModel":22,"timePerspective":22,"maskingInfo":27},"RANDOMIZED","SINGLE_GROUP","TREATMENT",{"masking":28,"maskingDescription":22,"whoMasked":29},"SINGLE",[30],"PARTICIPANT","Research is to compare and evaluate the primary and secondary implant stability, healing of the soft tissue around UV activated implants and conventional implants. The objectives are to access the primary and secondary implant stability using Resonance frequency analysis, marginal bone level using RVG with grid, healing of the soft tissue. The control group will be treated with conventional implant and test group will be treated with UV implants. The total number of participants are 12 and 24 sites (control - 12 sites, test - 12 sites) with 3 months follow up.",[33,39],{"label":34,"type":35,"description":36,"interventionNames":37},"conventional dental implant group","ACTIVE_COMPARATOR","conventional dental implant placement will act as control group.",[38],"Procedure: conventional implant",{"label":40,"type":41,"description":42,"interventionNames":43},"UV dental implant group","EXPERIMENTAL","UV activated implant placement will act as test group which has better osseointegration properties.",[44],"Procedure: UV implant",[46,51],{"type":47,"name":48,"description":49,"armGroupLabels":50,"otherNames":22},"PROCEDURE","conventional implant","A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated under local anesthesia, osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufacturer's instructions and parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. Conventional implant placement was done on one side.\n\nResonance frequency analysis instrument was used to measure Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and check the primary stability of the implant. The surgical wound closure was done with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl sutures.",[34],{"type":47,"name":52,"description":53,"armGroupLabels":54,"otherNames":22},"UV implant","A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated under local anesthesia and osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufacturer's instructions. Parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. UV implant was activated using UV Activator2 and placed in another site.\n\nResonance frequency analysis instrument was used to measure Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and primary stability of the implant was measured. The surgical wound closure was done with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl sutures.",[40],[56,61],{"name":57,"role":58,"phone":59,"phoneExt":22,"email":60},"Dr. PRABHUJI MLV, MDS","CONTACT","9448057407","prabhujimlv@gmail.com",{"name":62,"role":58,"phone":63,"phoneExt":22,"email":64},"Dr. shailja dutta, mds","7624845840","shailjadutta31@gmail.com",[66],{"facility":67,"status":68,"city":69,"state":70,"zip":71,"country":72,"countryCode":73,"cosmosGeoPoint":74,"geoPoint":79,"contacts":80},"Dr. Prabhuji MLV","RECRUITING","Bengaluru","Karnataka","562157","India","IN",{"type":75,"coordinates":76},"Point",[77,78],77.59369,12.97194,{"lat":78,"lon":77},[81,83],{"name":82,"role":58,"phone":59,"phoneExt":22,"email":60},"dr. prabhuji mlv, mds",{"name":84,"role":58,"phone":63,"phoneExt":22,"email":64},"dr. shailja dutta, mds",{"type":86,"investigatorFullName":22,"investigatorTitle":22,"investigatorAffiliation":22,"oldNameTitle":22,"oldOrganization":22},"SPONSOR","100557730",false,"NCT06541912","Comparative Evaluation of Implant Stability, Soft & Hard Tissue Healing Around UV Activated vs Conventional Implants","Comparative Evaluation of Implant Stability, Soft and Hard Tissue Healing Around UV Activated Versus Conventional Implants - A Randomized Clinical Trial.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* At east above 18 years of age\n* Patients who needs replacement for at least 2 missing teeth in the posterior region of mandible\n* Adequate bone volume to accommodate planned dental implants\n* Patients who will comply with oral health care instructions and necessary visits\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* General contraindications to dental implant treatment ( uncontrolled diabetes, severe cardiovascular or infectious disease)\n* Intravenous and oral bisphosphonate therapy\n* Unwillingness to return for the follow up examinations\n* Smokers\n* Patients who are psychologically unable to participate\n* Poor oral hygiene",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":97,"type":98},12,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[101],"NA","Research is to compare and evaluate the primary and secondary implant stability, healing of the soft tissue around UV activated implants and conventional implants.",[104],"UV Dental Implant",[106],"Dental Implants","2024-08-02",{"date":109,"type":110},"2024-08-07","ACTUAL",{"date":112,"type":110},"2024-02-15",{"date":114,"type":98},"2026-03-25",{"name":5,"class":6},1]