[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100559927":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":13,"overallOfficials":19,"centralContacts":23,"locations":29,"responsibleParty":45,"collaborators":18,"id":49,"slug":18,"hasResults":50,"nctId":51,"briefTitle":52,"officialTitle":53,"acronym":18,"eligibilityCriteria":54,"healthyVolunteers":55,"sex":56,"minAge":57,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":58,"targetDuration":18,"studyType":61,"phases":62,"briefSummary":64,"conditions":65,"keywords":67,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":18,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":69,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":70,"startDateStruct":73,"completionDateStruct":75,"leadSponsor":77,"locationsCount":78},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege","OTHER",[8],{"label":9,"type":6,"description":10,"interventionNames":11},"Patients with 4-8 osseointegrated implants","On the patient, we will successively take 6 impressions (2 conventional, 2 intraoral scanner, 2 photogrammetry) and then analyze these impressions to measure the repeatability of a technique. After each type of impression, a satisfaction questionnaire in VAS format will be given to the patient.",[12],"Other: Implant impression",[14],{"type":6,"name":15,"description":16,"armGroupLabels":17,"otherNames":18},"Implant impression","definitive impressions on implants",[9],null,[20],{"name":21,"affiliation":5,"role":22},"Marc Pr Lamy, Phd","STUDY_DIRECTOR",[24],{"name":25,"role":26,"phone":27,"phoneExt":18,"email":28},"Nathalie Robert, DDS","CONTACT","+32496318211","n.robert@chuliege.be",[30],{"facility":31,"status":32,"city":33,"state":34,"zip":35,"country":36,"cosmosGeoPoint":37,"geoPoint":42,"contacts":43},"Institut de Dentisterie","RECRUITING","Liège","Liege","4000","Belgium",{"type":38,"coordinates":39},"Point",[40,41],5.56749,50.63373,{"lat":41,"lon":40},[44],{"name":25,"role":26,"phone":27,"phoneExt":18,"email":28},{"type":46,"investigatorFullName":47,"investigatorTitle":48,"investigatorAffiliation":5,"oldNameTitle":18,"oldOrganization":18},"PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR","Nathalie Robert","Phd student","100559927",false,"NCT06570499","Comparison of Conventional Impressions, Intraoral Scanners and Digital Photogrammetry for Full-arch Implant Prosthesis.","Precision, Patient Satisfaction and Timing of Complete-arch Digital Implant Impression With a Conventional Impression, an Intraoral Scanner and a Photogrammetry Technique: A Prospective Clinical Comparative Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* edentulous maxilla or mandible with 4 to 8 osseointegrated implants (NobelBiocare®) and transgingival abutments tightened to 35N\u002Fcm (Multi-unit, NobelBiocare®).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with non-osseointegrated implants\n* Patients with different implant systems\n* Patients with incomplete edentulism",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":59,"type":60},20,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[63],"NA","The aim of this clinical trial is to compare implant-supported definitive impressions in edentulous patients (mandible or maxilla) with 4 to 8 osseointegrated implants. The main questions it aims to answer are :\n\nThe primary outcome of this prospective clinical comparative study is to analyse the precision of a complete-arch impression.\n\nThe secondary aim is to obtain patient satisfaction with these new types of impression.\n\nThe different impressions (conventional, intraoral scanner and photogrammetry) will be taken twice on the same patient.",[66],"Dental Implant Failed",[68],"accuracy, photogrammetry, dental implant","2024-08-23",{"date":71,"type":72},"2024-08-26","ACTUAL",{"date":74,"type":72},"2024-06-18",{"date":76,"type":60},"2024-12-15",{"name":5,"class":6},1]