[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100511746":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":20,"overallOfficials":28,"centralContacts":32,"locations":37,"responsibleParty":53,"collaborators":25,"id":55,"slug":25,"hasResults":56,"nctId":57,"briefTitle":58,"officialTitle":59,"acronym":25,"eligibilityCriteria":60,"healthyVolunteers":56,"sex":61,"minAge":62,"maxAge":63,"enrollmentInfo":64,"targetDuration":25,"studyType":67,"phases":68,"briefSummary":70,"conditions":71,"keywords":76,"overallStatus":40,"whyStopped":25,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":78,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":79,"startDateStruct":82,"completionDateStruct":84,"leadSponsor":86,"locationsCount":87},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University","OTHER",[8,14],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":12},"Parks technique","ACTIVE_COMPARATOR","patients receive coloanal anastomosis operation",[13],"Procedure: Parks technique",{"label":15,"type":16,"description":17,"interventionNames":18},"Bacon technique","EXPERIMENTAL","patients receive coloanal pull-out anastomosis operation",[19],"Procedure: Bacon technique",[21,26],{"type":22,"name":9,"description":23,"armGroupLabels":24,"otherNames":25},"PROCEDURE","compare different operational styles of low rectal cancer",[9],null,{"type":22,"name":15,"description":15,"armGroupLabels":27,"otherNames":25},[15],[29],{"name":30,"affiliation":5,"role":31},"Jun Huang, MD","PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR",[33],{"name":30,"role":34,"phone":35,"phoneExt":25,"email":36},"CONTACT","13926451242","huangj97@mail.sysu.edu.cn",[38],{"facility":39,"status":40,"city":41,"state":42,"zip":25,"country":43,"cosmosGeoPoint":44,"geoPoint":49,"contacts":50},"The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yatsen University","RECRUITING","Guangzhou","Guangdong","China",{"type":45,"coordinates":46},"Point",[47,48],113.25,23.11667,{"lat":48,"lon":47},[51],{"name":52,"role":34,"phone":35,"phoneExt":25,"email":36},"Jun Huang",{"type":54,"investigatorFullName":25,"investigatorTitle":25,"investigatorAffiliation":25,"oldNameTitle":25,"oldOrganization":25},"SPONSOR","100511746",false,"NCT05943444","Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer","Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Different Anastomosis Techniques(Parks Versus Bacon) in Low Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Multicentric and Randomized Controlled Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Men or women, aged between 18 and 75 years;\n2. Pathological diagnosis of rectal cancer before operation, with the distance from the lower edge of the tumor to the dentate line ≤ 3cm by MR imaging;\n3. No local complications (including complete\u002F incomplete obstruction, active bleeding, local invasion of sphincter or levator ani, etc.) before operation;\n4. Suitable for anal preservation surgery discussed by MDT;\n5. Adequate bone marrow, liver, renal and cardiac function meeting the requirements of surgery and anesthesia;\n6. R0 resection is expected technically;\n7. Provision of written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Previous history of malignant colorectal tumors;\n2. Complications such as obstruction and gastrointestinal bleeding that need an emergency operation;\n3. Unachievable R0 resection due to invasion of adjacent organs by primary tumor;\n4. Multiple primary tumors;\n5. History of other malignancy;\n6. Participation in other clinical trials within the previous 4 weeks of enrollment;\n7. ASA physical status score ≥ IV level and\u002For ECOG performance status ≥ 2;\n8. Intolerance of surgery due to liver, renal, cardiopulmonary or coagulation dysfunction, or underlying diseases;\n9. History of serious mental disorders;\n10. Women in pregnancy or lactation period;\n11. Uncontrolled infection before operation;\n12. Unsuitable to be included due to other clinical and laboratory conditions by the judgement of investigators.","ALL","18 Years","75 Years",{"count":65,"type":66},256,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[69],"NA","The goal of this study is to compare the postoperative anal function of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer after Parks operation (colon anal anastomosis) and Bacon operation (colon anal pull-out anastomosis), which may provide clinical evidence for the improvement of anal function and quality of life.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are: the difference of anal function 1 year after surgery type of study: clinical trial participant population: patients with low rectal cancer Participants will receive Parks operation of Bacon operation If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare Parks and Bacon operation to see if the anal function 1 year after surgery is different.",[72,73,74,75],"Rectal Neoplasms","Low Anterior Resection Syndrome","Anastomotic Leak","Quality of Life",[77,9,15],"anal function","2025-12-11",{"date":80,"type":81},"2025-12-18","ACTUAL",{"date":83,"type":81},"2023-08-08",{"date":85,"type":66},"2027-08-08",{"name":5,"class":6},1]