About this trial
There is limited local data available on the comparison between surgical blade no.11 and ophthalmic knife among patients with neglected clubfoot going through tenotomy. The study has been planned with the objective of comparing the effectiveness of surgical blade no. 11 and ophthalmic knife for percutaneous Achilles tendon tenotomy in Idiopathic clubfoot patients
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Any gender
Aged 2-5 years
Diagnosed with clubfoot
Disqualifiers
Children with other neuromuscular
Chromosomal abnormalities
Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita
Myelomeningocele
Trial population
Newly diagnosed patients of clubfoot less than 6 months of age and having the Pirani score 3-6 within the study period were recruited.
Trial design
Cohort
Retrospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Surgical Blade
DevicePatients after serial casting and manipulation according to the Ponseti method will go through tenotomy with surgical blade no. 11.
Ophthalmic Knife
DevicePatients after serial casting and manipulation according to the Ponseti method will go through tenotomy with ophthalmic knife.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Improvement in ankle dorsiflexion
The frequency of patients will be noted who will have improved Pirani score.
Secondary outcomes
Bleeding
The frequency of patients will be noted who will have bleeding severity as none, mild, moderate, or excessive.
Infection
The frequency of patients will be noted who will have infected wound.
Incomplete Tenotomy
Frequency of patients who will have incomplete release or residual deformity assessed after 3
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Muhammad Aamir Latif
Lead sponsor
RESnTEC, Institute of Research
Sponsor institution