[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100629583":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":19,"overallOfficials":25,"centralContacts":30,"locations":39,"responsibleParty":52,"collaborators":11,"id":54,"slug":11,"hasResults":55,"nctId":56,"briefTitle":57,"officialTitle":58,"acronym":59,"eligibilityCriteria":60,"healthyVolunteers":55,"sex":61,"minAge":62,"maxAge":11,"enrollmentInfo":63,"targetDuration":11,"studyType":66,"phases":67,"briefSummary":69,"conditions":70,"keywords":11,"overallStatus":41,"whyStopped":11,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":74,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":75,"startDateStruct":78,"completionDateStruct":80,"leadSponsor":82,"locationsCount":83},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Regionshospital Nordjylland","OTHER_GOV",[8,14],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":12},"mesh suture","EXPERIMENTAL",null,[13],"Device: mesh suture",{"label":15,"type":16,"description":11,"interventionNames":17},"planar mesh","ACTIVE_COMPARATOR",[18],"Device: planar mesh",[20,23],{"type":21,"name":9,"description":9,"armGroupLabels":22,"otherNames":11},"DEVICE",[9],{"type":21,"name":15,"description":15,"armGroupLabels":24,"otherNames":11},[15],[26],{"name":27,"affiliation":28,"role":29},"Nils Brandenburger","Regionhospital Nordjylland","STUDY_CHAIR",[31,36],{"name":32,"role":33,"phone":34,"phoneExt":11,"email":35},"Vitaly A Gameza","CONTACT","045 97640520","vitgam@rn.dk",{"name":37,"role":33,"phone":34,"phoneExt":11,"email":38},"Katrine Holte","k.holte@rn.dk",[40],{"facility":5,"status":41,"city":42,"state":11,"zip":11,"country":43,"cosmosGeoPoint":44,"geoPoint":49,"contacts":50},"RECRUITING","Hjørring","Denmark",{"type":45,"coordinates":46},"Point",[47,48],9.98229,57.46417,{"lat":48,"lon":47},[51],{"name":32,"role":33,"phone":34,"phoneExt":11,"email":35},{"type":53,"investigatorFullName":11,"investigatorTitle":11,"investigatorAffiliation":11,"oldNameTitle":11,"oldOrganization":11},"SPONSOR","100629583",false,"NCT07476560","Evaluating the Efficacy of Suture Mesh vs. Planar Mesh in Ventral Hernia Treatment","Mesh Matters: Evaluating the Efficacy of Suture Mesh vs. Planar Mesh in Ventral Hernia Treatment - a Randomized, Blinded Multicenter Study","MeMa","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Ventral hernia (maximum size 3 × 3 cm) measured with Ultrasound or CT.\n* Participants must be eligible for surgical repair using either mesh-suture or planar mesh\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age \\\u003C 18 years.\n* Acute (emergent) operation.\n* Pregnancy.\n* Women with plans for future pregnancies.\n* Withdrawal of informed consent during admission.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":64,"type":65},280,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[68],"NA","The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate whether mesh-suture affects wound complication rates, patient-reported quality of life, and operation time in adult patients undergoing surgery for small ventral hernias.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes mesh-suture reduce wound complication rates compared to planar mesh? Does mesh-suture improve patient-reported quality of life(QoL) and affect operation time compared to planar mesh?\n\nComparison group:\n\nResearchers will compare standard treatment with planar mesh to the interventional treatment with mesh-suture to see whether mesh-suture leads to fewer complications, better quality of life, and shorter operation time.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe randomized to receive either planar mesh or mesh-suture during hernia repair surgery.\n\nUndergo standardized preoperative assessment, including baseline data and QoL scoring.\n\nAttend a postoperative visit on day 7-13 for wound inspection and ultrasound. Complete QoL assessments at 90 days (telephone follow-up). Have operation time recorded and medical records reviewed for readmissions within 90 days.",[71,72,73],"Abdominal Wall Hernia","Umbilical Hernia Repair","Epigastric Hernia Repair","2026-03-12",{"date":76,"type":77},"2026-03-17","ACTUAL",{"date":79,"type":77},"2026-01-05",{"date":81,"type":65},"2032-12-31",{"name":5,"class":6},1]