Mesh-Free Versus Mesh-Based Surgery for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Comparison of Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication and Transobturator Tape

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18-80
SponsorMehmet Incebıyik

About this trial

This prospective clinical study aims to compare the short-term effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of two surgical techniques used for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI): Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication (PLP), a mesh-free native tissue repair method, and the Transobturator Tape (TOT) procedure, a commonly used mesh-based mid-urethral sling technique. The study evaluates continence improvement, perioperative and postoperative complications, operative time, hospital stay, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction. The goal is to provide evidence on whether a mesh-free surgical option such as PLP can offer comparable outcomes to mesh-based TOT, particularly for patients seeking alternatives to synthetic materials.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

Mixed urinary incontinence with predominant urge symptoms

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication (PLP)
  • Transobturator Tape (TOT)

Treatment groups

147 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

1
Harran University Research and Application Hospital63300, ŞanliurfaHALİLİYE, Turkey (Türkiye)

Sponsors and collaborators

Mehmet Incebıyik

Lead sponsor

Harran University

Sponsor institution