"Mulligan Technique vs Phonophoresis With Chitosan for Patellofemoral Pain"

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-35
SponsorAhram Canadian University

About this trial

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common knee condition causing pain and dysfunction. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two physical therapy treatments for PFPS: Mulligan mobilization with movement technique versus phonophoresis with chitosan gel.

Forty-five participants with patellofemoral pain syndrome will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) Mulligan technique group, (2) Phonophoresis with chitosan gel group, or (3) Control group receiving standard physical therapy exercises. Each group will receive treatment 3 times per week for 4 weeks.

The researchers want to determine which treatment is more effective in improving neuromuscular control, reducing pain, and improving function in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Participants will be assessed before and after the treatment period.

This study may help physical therapists and healthcare providers choose the most effective treatment approach for patients with patellofemoral pain.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Insidious onset of anterior knee pain

Retro patellar or peripatellar pain

Pain duration more than four weeks (chronic/subacute)

Pain severity ≥ 3/10 on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Disqualifiers

Traumatic injury (e.g., dislocation, fracture, ligament or meniscus pathology)

Inflammatory arthritis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, gout)

Prior knee surgery

Current use of NSAIDs or corticosteroids

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Mulligan technique
  • Phonophoresis with Chitosan Gel
  • Standard Physical Therapy Exercise Program

Treatment groups

45 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups

Locations

1
Ahram Canadian unveracity12573, CairoGiza Governorate, Egypt

Sponsors and collaborators

Ahram Canadian University

Lead sponsor