Novel Amblyopia Treatment With Virtual Reality Games

ConditionAmblyopia
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age5-17
SponsorMarjean Kulp

About this trial

The goal of this study is to compare the change in amblyopic eye acuity between treatment periods in children with amblyopia, aged 5-17 years. The main question it aims to answer is:

Is a 16-week course of amblyopia treatment using Vivid Vision Therapeutic (Dichoptic) Virtual Reality Games for approx. 25 min/day, 6 days/week more effective for improvement in amblyopic-eye VA, binocularity (stereoacuity, suppression, alignment), contrast sensitivity, attention, oculomotor function, visual-motor integration, and quality of life than 16 weeks of continued glasses alone?

Participants will each serve as their own control and complete:

Treatment period 1: Continued optical correction (glasses) alone for 16 weeks; Treatment period 2: Vivid Vision Therapeutic (Dichoptic) Virtual Reality Games for 16 weeks (approx. 25min/day, 6 days/week) plus continued optical correction

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Moderate to severe unilateral amblyopia (logMAR best corrected visual acuity 0.3 to 1.3) associated with anisometropia and/or strabismus of ≤5pd

Age normal VA in the nonamblyopic eye

Spectacle correction (if required) worn for at least 16 weeks, or until stability of VA is demonstrated (<0.1 logMAR change by the same testing method measured on 2 exams at least 8 weeks apart)

Interocular difference of ≥ 3 lines

Disqualifiers

Myopia greater than -6.00 diopters (D) spherical equivalent in either eye.

Previous intraocular or refractive surgery.

Previous dichoptic treatment > 2 weeks in duration

Ocular co-morbidity that may reduce visual acuity determined by an ocular examination performed within the past 7 months (Note: nystagmus per se does not exclude the participant if the above visual acuity criteria are met).

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Optical Correction

    Device

    Optical correction (if needed)

  • Therapeutic Dichoptic Virtual Reality Games

    Device

    Virtual Reality Game play for amblyopia treatment

Treatment groups

8 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Optical Correction aloneActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Therapeutic (Dichoptic) Virtual Reality Games plus Continued Optical CorrectionExperimental treatment 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Difference in Mean Change in Amblyopic Eye Visual Acuity

Optical correction worn for testing using Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS) protocol; HOTV for ages 5-6 years; E-ETDRS for ages 7 years and older

Time frame
Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Difference in Change in Stereoacuity/Binocularity

Optical correction worn for testing. Stereoacuity scores (seconds of arc) calculated based on the Randot Butterfly (scores: 2000, Nil) and Randot Preschool stereoacuity (scores: 800, 400, 200, 100, 60 and 40) tests. Lower scores indicate better stereoacuity. Nil (4000) defined as an incorrect response (or lack of an attempt) on the butterfly without a correct response on 800 seconds of arc level of Randot Preschool stereoacuity test. Stereoacuity scores will be ordered and assigned a rank score. Change in stereoacuity will be calculated as the difference in change in ranked score.

Time frame
Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
2

Difference in Mean Change in Amblyopic-Eye Contrast Sensitivity

Optical correction worn for testing. Spot Checks;Contrast sensitivity scores range from unable (\<0.90), and then from 0.90 to 2.05 (by 0.05 log contrast sensitivity units).

Time frame
Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
3

Difference in Mean Change in Attention

Optical correction worn for testing. The Children's Color Trails Test (CCTT) is a neuropsychological standardized test that measures attention, divided attention, and speed of mental processing.

Time frame
Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks
4

Difference in Mean Change in reading eye movements

Optical correction worn for testing with Readalyzer eye tracker.

Time frame
Baseline to 16 weeks versus 16 weeks to 32 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Marjean Kulp

Lead sponsor

Ohio State University

Sponsor institution

Beta Sigma Kappa - College of Optometrists in Vision Development

Collaborator

VividVision

Collaborator