About this trial
This study aims to describe conservative and invasive treatments for patients with chronic venous disease (CVD) in Belgium, and their association with clinical and patient-reported outcomes during a follow-up of 24 months.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patient receiving the diagnosis of CVD from the GP during the V0, according to international guidelines and made on a clinical basis,
Patient requiring and agreeing to receive conservative or invasive treatment,
French or Dutch speaking patient,
Patient signed informed consent and agrees to take part in the study and follow-up.
Disqualifiers
Patient with coagulation disorders such as thrombophilia and/or taking anticoagulation drugs,
Pregnant or breastfeeding patient,
Patient with severe Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease (POAD), with Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) < 0.8,
Patient with malignancy,
Trial population
Patients suffering from chronic venous disease who did not receive any dedicated treatment for CVD 3 months prior to inclusion
Trial design
Cohort
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Radiofrequency ablation using Closure fast
Procedure/SurgeryThermal ablation technique
Aethoxysclerol
Procedure/Surgerysclero-or foamsclerose
Daflon
DrugVenoactive drugs
Compression stocking
DeviceCompression
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Change in Chronic Venous Insufficiency QOL questionnaire- 20 (CIVIQ-20) score
Chronic Venous Insufficiency QOL questionnaire-20 score, min 20 max 100, higher means worse outcome
Secondary outcomes
Intervention as secondary/add-on treatment
Proportion of patients who received an intervention as secondary/add-on treatment to conservative treatment
The change in the Chronic Venous Insufficiency QOL questionnaire-20 score (CIVIQ-20)
The change in the CIVIQ-20 over time; min 20 max 100, higher means worse outcome
The change in the clinical part of the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical and Pathophysiological classification (CEAP classification)
The change in the clinical part of the CEAP classification over time, min C0, max C6, higher means worse outcome
The change in the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS)
The change in the rVCSS over time; min 0 max 30, higher means worse outcome
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: