Rehabilitation Training With Music-support & Exercise Tolerance in COPD and CRF Patients.

ConditionCOPD
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age40-85
SponsorIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA

About this trial

Therapeutic-rehabilitative interventions supported by music can be considered important resources in many clinical contexts. Some studies report the improvement of psychological (i.e. anxiety) and physiological parameters such for example, dyspnea, blood pressure, quality of life, sleep disturbances, etc. through voice, singing, exercise with wind instruments, and sometimes listening to music. Among the various instruments proposed to support the physical training of COPD patients, music was also tested and, in particular, music as a distracting auditory stimulus (DAS) has been used to increase exercise and physical activity adherence and to reduce the perception of dyspnea in COPD subjects.

This randomized controlled trial will compare -in patients with COPD and CRF- the effects of the addiction of music to the training on exercise capacity (possible improvement of endurance and reduction of fatigue and dyspnea) with respect to the usual rehabilitation modality (no music).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Diagnosis of COPD (Forced expiratory volume in 1 second / post-bronchodilator forced vital capacity < 0.7) without functional reversibility

Chronic respiratory failure with stable hypoxia (PaO2 < 60 mmHg in room air)

Long Term Oxygen Therapy (LTOT) for at least 3 months

Clinical stability: pH range 7.38-7.42, with no recent exacerbations in the last 7 days and no changes in drug therapy in the previous 7 days

Disqualifiers

Non-invasive ventilation at home

Cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination Score < 22)

Asthma or evidence of bronchodilator response

Pulmonary fibrosis

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • MS group

    Other intervention

    All patients will perform the usual training by listening a piece of music of the same duration as the training. The patient will be able to choose among 4 different musical proposals corresponding to 4 different styles: rock, modern, jazz and classical. The song chosen by the patient will be the musical support for all the sessions of training on the cycle ergometer. The musical pieces will be composed with a constant rhythm (bpm=60) which, from a tonal point of view, will echo the pedaling movement. The constant rhythm will be superimposed on musical patterns in the form of loops in the styles mentioned. The musical support will assume a "priming" (activation) and "dragging" (synchronization) function, facilitating movement planning/synchronization and creating a pleasant context in which to carry out training

  • C group

    Other intervention

    All patients will perform 12 to 14 supervised sessions depending on the center they belong to (5-6 sessions/week) each consisting of 30 minutes of exercise at the cycle ergometer plus 3 minutes of warm-up and 3 minutes of recovery. After a warm-up phase at 0 W, the initial workload will be set to 60% of the theoretical maximum. Intensity increases or decreases of 10 W will be made according to the criteria of Maltais et al (workload will be increased when patients will report dyspnea and/or leg fatigue as ≤3 on a Borg scale modified to 10 points of perceived effort. The training load will remain unchanged if the Borg score is 4 or 5 and will be reduced for scores ≥6). Patients will have to maintain a pedaling frequency between 55 and 60 rpm.

Treatment groups

156 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Usual training with the support of music (MS)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Usual training without music (C)Active comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in effort tolerance at 6 minutes walking test: Minimal Clinical Important Difference (MCID) at 6MWT

To evaluate whether the training exercise with music, compared to usual training (without music), is more effective in improving the exercise capacity measured in terms of the number of patients able to achieve the MCID (Minimal Clinical Important Difference) of 30 meters at the six-minute walking test (6MWT).

Time frame
From the date of randomization to the End of the program (up to 3 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in effort tolerance at 6 minutes walking test: distance at 6MWT

To evaluate whether the training exercise with music, compared to a usual training (without music), is more effective in improving the exercise capacity measured in terms of meters covered in six minutes

Time frame
From the date of randomization to the End of the program (up to 3 weeks)
2

Change in effort tolerance at the constant load exercise test (CLET)

To evaluate whether the training exercise with music, compared to a usual training (without music), is more effective in improving the exercise capacity measured in terms of time measured in seconds at the CLET

Time frame
From the date of randomization to the End of the program (up to 3 weeks)
3

Change in dyspnea: total sessions

To evaluate whether the training exercise with music, compared to a usual training (without music), is more effective in reducing dyspnoea (measured with the Borg scale) during training (total sessions)

Time frame
From the date of randomization to the End of the program (up to 3 weeks)
4

Change in dyspnea:iso-times at CLET

To evaluate whether the training exercise with music, compared to a usual training (without music), is more effective in reducing dyspnea at the CLET by evaluating dyspnea at the same minutes observed in the initial test (iso-times)

Time frame
From the date of randomization to the End of the program (up to 3 weeks)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.