Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Needle Tenotomy (PNT) vs Percutaneous Ultrasonic Needle Tenotomy (PUT) for Gluteal Tendinosis

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorUniversity of Colorado, Denver

About this trial

The goal of this study is to determine if a newer tenotomy technique utilizing an ultrasound needle is more effective than the traditional tenotomy technique utilizing a simple hypodermic needle for gluteal tendinosis. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Is pain from the gluteal tendinosis improved with either technique, and, if so, is there a difference in the improvement between techniques? 2. Is there an improvement in function for gluteal tendinosis, and, if so, is there a difference between techniques?

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Diagnosis of gluteal (medius and/or minimus) tendinosis confirmed clinically and with ultrasonography or MRI

Failure to improve after 3 months of nonoperative treatment

Symptoms present for longer than 3 months

Disqualifiers

Patients with concomitant injuries or pain

Full thickness tears of the affected tendon

Prior corticosteroid injection of the affected tendon within the last 3 months

Prior PNT of the affected tendon

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Percutaneous needle tenotomy (PNT)
  • Percutaneous ultrasonic tenotomy (PUT, Tenex Device)

Treatment groups

110 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

1
UCHealth CU Sports Medicine - Colorado Center80222, DenverColorado, United States

Sponsors and collaborators

University of Colorado, Denver

Lead sponsor