Colon Cancer Screening

4

Review clinical trials related to Colon Cancer Screening. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Community Gateway to Health Study

The goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of a multi-level intervention on cancer prevention and social determinants of health outcomes. This partnership between academic and community-based researchers aims to link community health centers and communities in ways that maximize both civic engagement and participation in cancer control care. The system-level intervention consists of two components: (1) provision of community health center systems-level tools for cancer screening (breast, cervical, colorectal) and tobacco cessation treatment gaps; and (2) digital access screening and navigation. These interventions will be delivered via usual care.

Participants needed: 100
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)Updated: May 18, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Community health center staff or community partners [+1]

Under 18

Status: Recruiting

Bundled Cancer Screening and Genetic Services Navigation

The goal of this study is to test bundled familial cancer risk assessment + multicancer (colorectal + breast) vs. single (breast) cancer navigation, using a wait list control for colorectal cancer screening referral and navigation. Among those eligible, this study will test usual care referral to genetic services vs. pretest education + usual care referral. The study also will assess how bundled multicancer navigation works and for whom it is most effective through a multisite, mixed-methods patient- and organization-level process evaluation.

Participants needed: 820
Trial details
Age: 45-74Biological sex: FemaleType: InterventionalSponsor: Georgetown UniversityUpdated: May 8, 2026Locations: 2
Eligibility criteria

Seeking screening navigation services through programs at a participating site (... [+7]

Not engaged with or planning to use navigation programs at Georgetown Lombardi C... [+8]

Status: Recruiting

Colonoscopy Bowel Prep Comparison Among Diabetic Patients

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the Golytely or SUPREP bowel preparation works more effectively in bowel cleansing for colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy in patients with diabetes. The main questions this study aims to answer are: 1. Is there a significant difference in bowel prep cleanse between Golytely and SUPREP in patients with diabetes based on the Boston Bowel Prep Score (BBPS) as assessed by blinded, skilled endoscopists? 2. Is there a significant difference in patients' tolerance between the bowel preparations as assessed by the validated Mayo Bowel Prep Tolerability Form (MBPTF)? Participants will: * Be randomized to take either Golytely or SUPREP bowel preparation prior to their colonoscopy * Complete the MBPTF on the procedure date prior to the scheduled colonoscopy * Undergo a standardized screening colonoscopy during which time a blinded endoscopist will document the participant's BBPS The research team hypothesizes that SUPREP will have a significant difference in tolerability (based on MBPTF), while exhibiting no difference in bowel cleanse (based on BBPS) in the diabetic patient population.

Participants needed: 80
Trial details
Phase: Phase 4Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Eisenhower Army Medical CenterUpdated: Jan 20, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Participants having provided informed consent with signature on informed consent... [+3]

Unable to provide informed consent to participate in the study Such as a mental... [+14]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Randomized Control Trial Comparing the Incidence of Loop Formation in Colonoscopy Techniques

A colonoscopy is a common procedure used to check for problems in the colon, such as disease or other health issues. Although it's widely used, one challenge is that the flexible tube used in the procedure (called a colonoscope) can sometimes form loops inside the colon. When this happens, pushing the tube further doesn't help it move forward-it just makes the loop bigger, which can make the procedure harder to complete. These loops can also cause more pain for the patient, require more sedation (medication to relax or put the patient to sleep), and increase the time it takes to finish the procedure. Because of this, it's important to find ways to reduce loop formation. Two common methods used in colonoscopies are called air insufflation and water infusion. This study will compare the two methods-air vs. water-to see which one causes fewer loops. It will be a randomized controlled trial, meaning participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two methods. The study will involve real patients, and the data will be collected by physicians, residents (doctors in training), and medical students. During the colonoscopies, images from a tool that guides the scope will be recorded on video. Experienced staff doctors and surgical residents (with at least two months of special training in this procedure) will perform the colonoscopies. Each procedure will be supervised by a team member, such as a medical student, resident, or staff doctor. Afterward, two reviewers who don't know which method was used will watch the videos to look for any loops. They will look for specific types of loops, including n, alpha, reverse alpha, reverse splenic, and gamma loops. The study will also track how long it takes to reach the end of the colon (called the cecum), how comfortable the patient was (using a standard rating system already used in all colonoscopies), and how much sedation was needed.

Participants needed: 142
Trial details
Age: 18-80Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Memorial University of NewfoundlandUpdated: Nov 24, 2025
Eligibility criteria

Consenting patients who are undergoing a routine colonoscopy. [+1]

Refusal to participate [+5]