Complications

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of chlorhexidine versus saline in flushing the surgical area during colorectal cancer surgery. The primary outcomes included surgical site infection, postoperative complication rates, et al.

To evaluate the effectiveness of the gastroscopy, air, and methylene blue (GAM) leak testing in reducing the incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications, especially anastomotic leakage, in patients with colorectal cancer. The primary outcomes included is the incidence of anastomotic complications (mainly anastomotic leak) within 30 days after surgery

Evaluate the safety and efficacy of postoperative Pre-emptive EVT (PEVT) in reducing the incidence of anastomotic leaks within 30 days after surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. Compare the differences between the PEVT group and the control group in terms of operation time, length of hospital stay, and total medical costs. Analyze the incidence of other postoperative complications in the two groups, such as wound infection, abdominal abscess, and intestinal obstruction. Assess the impact of PEVT on postoperative recovery indicators, including time to first flatus, time to first defecation, and time to ambulation. Observe the occurrence of PEVT-related adverse events, such as device displacement, bleeding, and infection.

This prospective study investigates the effects of neoadjuvant therapy on endothelial function, microvascular tissue density, and tissue fibrosis in patients with colorectal cancer and their association with perioperative complications. The primary objective is to assess differences in microvascular tissue density between patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and those who did not, biomarkers, and demographic factors between patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and those who underwent surgery as initial treatment, and to compare clinical outcomes. The study will include 34 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy and 34 patients for whom surgery is the first-line treatment. Patients will be followed until discharge from the hospital, and complications after discharge will be monitored through medical records one month after surgery.

This study aims to compare the effects of using prophylactic abdominal drainage tubes during Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (LDG) for gastric cancer through a multicenter non-inferiority randomized trial. The study is divided into two groups: 1. ERAS-tubeless group: The ERAS protocol without nasogastric decompression, nasojejunal feeding or prophylactic abdominal drainage tubes. 2. ERAS-tube group: the ERAS protocol with prophylactic abdominal drainage tubes, along with no nasogastric decompression or nasojejunal feeding tubes. Patients will be randomly assigned to the two groups in a 1:1 ratio, with the primary analysis based on the modified intention-to-treat population (mITT) and secondary analysis on the per-protocol (PP) population. Perioperative management will adhere to ERAS guidelines, and postoperative quality of life will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and QoR-15 scores. Preliminary training on the standard ERAS protocol is administered to all members in the team before the initiation of the study, ensuring in-group members to fully master the requirements and other related contents in the study. Data collectors, analysts, and outcome evaluators will remain blinded to group allocation. The findings of this study are expected to provide high-quality evidence on the feasibility of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage in the context of ERAS, thereby contributing to the optimization of postoperative management strategies for gastric cancer surgery.

For seniors aged 65 and over (inclusive) undergoing surgical procedures (bone surgery, traumatology, orthopedics) in an acute or elective setting, the relationship between preoperative urinary tract infection/colonization (within 30 days before the procedure) and the occurrence of predefined postoperative complications (monitoring during the patients' hospitalization) will be observed

Objective: This study aimed to determine the effect of applying the IV House Ultradressing catheter protector on the frequency of peripheral venous catheter (PVC) replacements and complications in patients with peripheral venous catheterization in an oncology clinic. Materials and Methods: The research was planned as a randomized controlled experimental study. The population of the study consisted of patients hospitalized in the oncology clinic. The sample of the study was calculated based on the data from the study by Büyükyılmaz et al. (2019), which found a significant difference in the average duration of catheter-related phlebitis in the intervention group (2.10 ± 1.55 days) compared to the control group (1.27 ± 0.45 days), with an effect size of d=0.72. As a result of the sample size calculation, 32 patients were predicted for each group. Considering that 10% of patients might drop out during the study, a total of 70 patients, with 35 in each group, were decided to be included. After the catheter is inserted, patients in the intervention group will have their catheter area protected with IV House Ultradressing, while no protective measures will be applied to the control group. Both groups will be evaluated in terms of catheter duration and PVC complications. It is planned to use t-tests and chi-square tests for data analysis.

This prospective cohort study enrolls subjects who experience carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. The purpose of the study is to evaluate therapeutic effects of various treatments and short and long-term outcomes in CO poisoned patients. In addition, complications of brain and heart susceptible to CO are investigated through various ways and the association between complications and the patient's prognosis is also investigated. All subjects will be regularly monitored by physicians participating in this study.