Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

This prospective longitudinal study will compare incidence rates of Medicare beneficiary surgical and minimally invasive intervention post index procedure, as well as harms associated with the MILD procedure, at 24 months post-treatment with MILD, tested against a control group of similar patients that have had a comparable procedure. This study will start with patients treated with a study procedure having an index date on or after January 1, 2017, and enrollment will continue until stopped by the sponsor.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether microdecompression alone is as effective as decompression with extension of fusion surgery in patients with symptomatic adjacent segment stenosis after previous lumbar fusion surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is microdecompression alone non-inferior to decompression with extension of fusion in improving disability 24 months after surgery, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)? Does microdecompression alone result in similar or lower rates of complications, reoperations, pain, and radiological progression compared with decompression and fusion? Researchers will compare microdecompression alone to decompression with extension of lumbar fusion to determine whether the less invasive procedure can achieve similar clinical outcomes while reducing surgical burden and preserving spinal structures. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: microdecompression alone or decompression with extension of lumbar fusion. Undergo the assigned surgical treatment. Attend clinical and radiological follow-up visits at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Complete questionnaires assessing disability, pain, quality of life, sleep quality, and mental health. Undergo routine imaging and clinical examinations to evaluate treatment outcomes and possible complications.

This study examines how well computed tomography (CT) imaging performed during spine surgery - known as intraoperative CT - can detect instability in the lower (lumbar) part of the spine. Spinal instability means that the bones of the spine move more than they normally should, which can contribute to pain and may affect the outcome of surgery. Before surgery, doctors usually check for this instability using X-rays taken while the patient bends forward and backward. These X-rays do not always show instability clearly. During surgery, the patient lies face down and the muscles are fully relaxed, which can change how the spine appears on imaging. The purpose of this study is to learn whether CT images taken during surgery can identify signs of lumbar spinal instability as reliably as standard imaging performed before surgery, and whether they can reveal signs of instability that were not visible beforehand. To do this, the researchers will review imaging and clinical information from adults who are undergoing surgery for degenerative (wear-related) conditions of the lower spine. This study does not change a patient's surgery or treatment. It only analyzes imaging and clinical information that are already part of standard care. The findings may help guide imaging and surgical decisions in lumbar spine surgery in the future.

Primary objective: To identify older adults with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) early in the course of the illness, at a time when disease modifying therapies are most effective. The specific aims of this epidemiologic investigation include: 1. To identify subjects with previous lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) Surgery who have evidence of transthyretin (TTR) amyloid deposits in spinal specimens and could be at risk for ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. 2. To evaluate for ATTR-CA among those with localized TTR in the spinal tissue. The study will also explore the following: 1. The prevalence of amyloid in lumbar spinal stenosis specimens by Congo Red staining. 2. The prevalence of TTR deposits among subjects with amyloid as determined by mass spectrometry. 3. Evaluation of a novel artificial intelligence technique for that can identify amyloid histologically with standard H\&E staining. 4. Difference in ATTR-CA prevalence between subjects with TTR and indeterminate amyloid deposits in subject's spine by myocardial uptake of technetium pyrophosphate scan (Tc99-PYP).

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common degenerative diseases of the spinal column, with symptoms including low back pain which worsens with ambulation, poor balance, decreased activity due to pain, and a marked decrease in quality of life (QoL). Prevalence rises with age, and current treatment options range from varied conservative management strategies, to surgical intervention with decompression of neural structures. While the effects of surgical decompression on back pain and QoL has been widely researched, the effects of surgery on activity levels is less well understood. Though patients generally have subjective improvements in this parameter after surgery, objective measurements in this patient group have been lacking. This study aims to investigate the effects of decompressive surgery on activity levels in elderly patients with LSS. Measurements of activity will be taken before and after decompressive surgery, as well as with regular intervals during a two-year follow-up period. A better understanding of the effect that LSS has on activity may lead to more patients being able to receive surgical treatment, which is hypothesized to lead to an increase in QoL and less perceived disability amongst this patient group.

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common degenerative diseases of the spinal column, with symptoms including low back pain which worsens with ambulation, poor balance, decreased activity due to pain, and a marked decrease in quality of life (QoL). Prevalence rises with age, and current treatment options range from varied conservative management strategies, to surgical intervention with decompression of neural structures. While the effects of surgical decompression on back pain and QoL has been widely researched, the effects of surgery on patient balance is less well understood. Though patients generally have subjective improvements in this parameter after surgery, objective measurements in this patient group have been lacking. This study aims to investigate the effects of decompressive surgery on postural balance in elderly patients with LSS. Measurements of postural balance will be taken before and after decompressive surgery, as well as with regular intervals during a two-year follow-up period. A better understanding of the effect that LSS has on balance may lead to more patients being able to receive surgical treatment, which is hypothesized to lead to an increase in QoL and less perceived disability amongst this patient group.

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common degenerative condition that can cause chronic low back and leg pain, especially during walking or standing. Interlaminar epidural steroid injections are widely used to relieve pain and improve function in patients who do not respond adequately to conservative treatments. These injections are usually performed under fluoroscopic guidance, which allows accurate needle placement but exposes patients and healthcare providers to ionizing radiation. Ultrasound guidance has emerged as an alternative technique that avoids radiation exposure; however, ultrasound alone may not always confirm correct epidural spread of the injected medication. This prospective, randomized clinical trial aims to compare two commonly used imaging approaches for interlaminar epidural steroid injections in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: fluoroscopy-guided injection and ultrasound-guided injection with fluoroscopic confirmation (hybrid technique). The study will evaluate patient satisfaction, radiation exposure, procedure time, technical success, pain relief, and functional outcomes. The results of this study are expected to help identify the most effective and safe imaging guidance method for interlaminar epidural steroid injections in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), a common degenerative lumbar condition characterized by low back pain, leg pain, and neurogenic claudication, significantly impairs patients' quality of life. Its prevalence continues to rise with the aging population. For patients who do not respond to conservative treatment, surgical intervention remains a key therapeutic approach, with lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) being a commonly employed procedure. The technique has evolved from posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and, more recently, to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). Although MIS-TLIF can effectively reduce tissue trauma and complications, it still faces clinical challenges such as intraoperative visual blind spots and the potential for postoperative chronic back pain associated with reliance on conventional pedicle screws. To address these limitations, our research team independently developed a highly integrated, miniaturized (with an outer diameter of only 1.8 mm), and maneuverable L-Unitary Soft Endoscope (LUSE) minimally invasive system. Its unique design helps avoid obstruction of the surgical field and allows flexible adjustment during the procedure. Currently, there is a lack of clinical efficacy evaluations in China on the use of this LUSE system for TLIF surgery (referred to as LUSE-TLIF) in treating LSS. Therefore, this study aims to systematically compare LUSE-TLIF with the currently mainstream MIS-TLIF, evaluating its safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes in the treatment of LSS, in order to provide spine surgeons with a novel and potentially superior minimally invasive surgical option.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a modification to metaxalone 640 mg can reduce low back and leg pain. The participants will be 18 to 80 years old, healthy with newly occurring back or leg pain. The main question aims to compare a group taking active treatment and a group taking a look-alike substance containing no active treatment. All participants will answer questions on Day 1, before treatment, and on 7-day after treatment, about: * Amount and quality of pain * Interference with physical activity * Interference with sleep

This study seeks to evaluate the impact of intra-operative topical epidural steroid usage in patients undergoing 1-2 level lumbar laminectomy. The study will examine post-operative opioid usage, length of stay, return to work, and patient reported outcomes following these procedures.

This prospective, observational, non-randomized clinical study aims to evaluate the intraoperative and postoperative effects of opioid-free multimodal anesthesia compared with opioid-containing anesthesia methods in adult patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. Patients will be managed according to routine clinical practice and assigned to one of three groups based on the analgesic strategy used by the attending anesthesiologist: (1) opioid-free anesthesia using multimodal agents and/or erector spinae plane (ESP) block; (2) ESP block plus intraoperative opioids; or (3) opioid-based anesthesia without regional blocks. The primary objective is to compare postoperative pain control and opioid requirements within the first 48 hours after surgery. Secondary objectives include evaluating opioid-related side effects such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, constipation, delayed mobilization, urinary retention, and postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Standard postoperative analgesia, including intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), acetaminophen, and NSAIDs, will be provided for all patients. The study aims to determine whether an opioid-free multimodal analgesic approach can reduce opioid consumption and related adverse effects while maintaining adequate analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery.

Explore efficacy, complications, and other factors associated with anaesthetic choice- To evaluate the efficacy of local + MAC as an alternative anesthetic to general anesthesia and to analyze patients' outcomes and experiences.

The goal of this interventional study is to evaluate the rate of existing lower limb peripheral artery disease (PAD) in patients with surgically lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). PAD and LSS can present similar symptoms and it can be difficult to diagnose PAD using conventional methods, depending on the location of the arterial disease. The main questions it aims to answer are : * What's the prevalence of PAD in LSS patients? * Which exam among routine tools is the most accurate to diagnose PAD in this population? Around their surgery for LSS (a few weeks before or after), participants will be included in a vascular medicine service. After checking of eligibility criteria, they will undergo a contrast-enhanced CT scan for the diagnosis of PAD and various routine diagnostic tests: Doppler ultrasound, treadmill tests, pressure index, pulse palpation.

Lumbar spinal stenosis is defined as the narrowing of the spinal canal resulting from degenerative changes in the spinal joints, intervertebral discs, and the ligamentum flavum. Pressure fluctuations within the cerebral and spinal vascular systems lead to the formation of pulsations. The periodic occurrence of these pulsations in the dura mater is referred to as spinal dural pulsation.The vibratory movements of the dura mater have been interpreted as an indicator that the spinal cord is freely mobile within the subarachnoid space and not subjected to any external compression.This study aims to investigate whether the presence of dural pulsation is associated with clinical and radiological parameters in patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis

Lumbar spinal surgery is common, and the incidence of spinal fusion has increased dramatically over the past three decades. Patients requiring spinal surgery are typically prescribed several analgesics, (including opioids) while awaiting surgery. Postoperatively, use of high doses of opioids or anti-inflammatory medications have drawbacks. Severe post-operative pain is reported by 45-80% of patients and rates are generally higher in the opioid tolerant patients. Regional anesthesia (blocking nerves with local anesthetics) works locally, thereby avoiding many side effects associated with other analgesics. One type of nerve block is called erector spinae plane block (ESP). Single injection nerve blocks have been found to decrease pain, nausea, and opioid consumption, while increasing patient satisfaction and quality of recovery. However, these effects only last for 24 hours or less while the worst pain occurs around 36 hours after surgery. Surgeon-placed indwelling catheters could allow infusions of local anesthetics for 54 hours. This randomized control trial seeks to assess the effectiveness of surgeon-placed ESP catheters for pain control after lumbar spine surgery. Hypothesis: Patients receiving a cESP will have less pain, improved quality of recovery, and opioid use following lumbar fusion surgery than those receiving current standard of care pain management. Methodology: Adult patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery under orthopedic surgery in Halifax will be eligible. The study will include 100 participants, randomly assigned to 2 study arms of 50 participants (1:1 basis to Ropivacaine and placebo groups). At the end of surgery, the surgeon will place the ESP catheters in all study patients under sterile conditions before closing the wound. Ropivacaine 0.5% or normal saline (placebo) 15ml will be injected through each catheter (total 30ml). In the postanesthetic care unit (PACU), two elastomeric pumps will be attached to the ESP catheters. These will be filled with either Ropivacaine 0.2% or normal saline (placebo). The elastomeric pumps are small bottle that patients can carry with them after discharge home. The pumps automatically run at an infusion rate of 10 ml/hr for 54 hours. All patients will also receive the standard of care for pain management for this patient population, which is opioid based with acetaminophen. A quality of recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire will be completed at 72 hours post-operatively. Pain, catheter complication, and opioid use data will be gathered from the patient's charts at 24, 48, and 72 hours post-operatively. At 3- and 6-month follow-ups, patients will complete the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire. We will analyze differences in pain and opioid consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours, quality of recovery index scores at 72 hours, postoperative complication rates, and persistent pain at 3 and 6 months.

Opioid overuse is a widespread public health crisis in the United States with increasing rates of addiction and overdose deaths from prescription opioids. Reducing the need for opiate analgesics in the post-operative setting has become a high priority in minimizing long-term opioid use in surgical patients. This study will serve to demonstrate the efficacy of the addition of regional analgesic techniques in reducing post-operative opioid requirements in patients undergoing common lumbar spinal surgical procedures.

This cross-sectional observational study aims to quantitatively compare three-dimensional gait parameters, surface electromyography (EMG) patterns, and radiological parameters among patients with different degenerative spinal conditions-including lumbar disc herniation (LDH), lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), lumbar sagittal imbalance (LSI), degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS), and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM)-alongside a healthy control group. The analysis focuses on spatiotemporal gait characteristics (step length, stride length, cadence), lower limb kinematics and kinetics (hip/knee/ankle joint angles, moments, and powers during stance and swing phases), and surface EMG amplitudes (thoracic erector spinae, multifidus, gluteus maximus, and rectus abdominis muscles) during standardized walking tasks. Additionally, radiological parameters (e.g., pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, coronal Cobb angle) will be correlated with gait and muscle activation deviations. The study employs motion capture systems, force plates, and high-density EMG to objectively differentiate disease-specific movement impairments. Findings from this study may establish biomechanical and neuromuscular signatures for each degenerative condition, providing a framework for personalized rehabilitation strategies, gait retraining, and surgical outcome assessment in spinal disorders. Comparative analysis with healthy controls will further elucidate pathological alterations in gait and muscle recruitment patterns caused by degenerative spinal diseases.

Long-term clinical results of two methods of surgical treatment (spinal decompression with or without fusion) in patients with single-level lumbar stenosis will be compared. A clear framework for surgical treatment methods and standardized postoperative rehabilitation treatment will be set to obtain the maximum homogeneity of the patient groups. This trial should provide the first level of evidence for the need for spinal fusion in patients with single-level lumbar stenosis, subject to the high homogeneous comparison groups. Additional results will allow comparing the economic aspects of different surgical treatments for 2 years after surgery.

Lumbosacral spinal stenosis (LSS) is a leading cause of limited mobility, reduced independence, and poor health outcomes in older adults, and is very common in older adult Veterans. Several years ago, major research studies indicated that surgery for LSS was more effective than usual (medical) management. Nonetheless, there are many patients for whom surgery is not the ideal therapy. There have been reports that modifications in daily activities including temporary use of a modified rolling walker and changes in sleep positioning may help relieve LSS. The investigators have assembled a VA team to study this carefully. The investigators will recruit a small group of older adult Veterans with LSS to try out this program; the investigators will monitor them closely for relief of their symptoms and improvements in walking. The investigators will, as part of this small study, try to understand potential barriers to use of this therapy. The investigators will interview the Veterans and healthcare providers to identify problems that may arise in trying this therapy. If this small study works, the investigators plan to expand the effort.

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a condition where the spinal canal becomes narrowed and can cause symptoms such as back pain, numbness, leg pain, and difficulty walking. Surgery is often considered when symptoms do not improve with medical treatment. This study will compare two types of surgery used to treat lumbar spinal stenosis: decompressive laminectomy alone and decompressive laminectomy with transpedicular screw fixation. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical options. The purpose of this study is to determine which approach provides better pain relief, improved function, fewer complications, and better spinal stability after surgery.

This is a prospective, multi-center open-label single arm post-market study where the purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the market approved Spinal Simplicity Minuteman G5 MIS Fusion Plate and bone graft material in patients with degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine resulting in chronic low back pain with lower extremity symptoms and concurrent neurogenic claudication. The indication for the device under study is degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine resulting in back pain with lower extremity symptoms and neurogenic claudication.

This prospective observational study aims to develop artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive models to estimate treatment response in patients with sciatica undergoing transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). Approximately 1500 adult patients diagnosed with sciatica and scheduled for TFESI at Marmara University Training and Research Hospital Algology Clinic will be enrolled. Clinical, radiological, laboratory, and psychological data will be systematically collected before the procedure and at multiple follow-up points (1 hour, 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-treatment). Pain relief, measured by a 50% or greater reduction in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), will be the primary outcome. The study will use these comprehensive data sets to train and validate AI algorithms, aiming to create a decision-support system that can predict individual patient responses to TFESI and improve personalized treatment planning.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the theory of epidural pressure by comparing a surgical procedure that aims to perform less bone resection compared to conventional surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The main questions it aims to answer is: Is bony decompression of the lumbar canal performed until normalization of epidural pressure not inferior to conventional surgery in achieving clinical improvement in patients with symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis? Researchers will: Compare conventional open laminectomy to bony decompression of the lumbar canal until normalization of epidural pressure is achieved. Participants will: * Be randomized to one of the two surgical interventions: laminectomy guided by epidural pressure measure or conventional laminectomy. * Visit the clinic for checkups and tests until 1 year of follow-up.

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a novel expandable OLIF (Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion) cage with posterior bone grafting in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. OLIF is a minimally invasive spinal surgery technique that restores intervertebral height and relieves nerve compression by placing a cage into the disc space. The new device allows surgeons to adjust the height of the cage during surgery and deliver bone grafts through a special channel after expansion. This study compares the outcomes of patients receiving the new cage versus those treated with a conventional OLIF cage. The trial will assess pain relief, functional improvement, spinal stability, fusion success, and potential complications. Radiological images and patient-reported scores (like VAS and ODI) will be collected over 12 months. The study includes patients aged 40 to 80 with single-level lumbar spine disease who have not improved after at least 6 months of conservative treatment. This study will help determine whether the new expandable cage offers clinical advantages and better long-term outcomes for patients undergoing OLIF surgery.

A single-center, prospective cohort trial aims to provide stronger evidence regarding the impact of degenerative spondylolisthesis on the clinical outcome of unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar spinal stenosis