Metastatic Lung Cancer

This is a study to investigate the safety and efficacy of an investigational OBX-115 regimen in adult participants with advanced solid tumors.

First in human study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BBO-10203, a PI3Kα:RAS breaker, alone and in combination with other anti-cancer agents in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BDTX-4933-101 is a first-in-human, open-label, Phase 1/2 dose escalation, dose optimization and expansion study designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of S241656 as monotherapy and in combination with other anti-cancer therapies in participants with selected advanced malignancies. The study population for the Dose Escalation part of the study comprises adults with recurrent advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, and other solid tumors harboring KRAS, HRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and/or CRAF (Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma (RAF1)) mutations or alterations. A dose optimization part in adults with NSCLC may follow the dose escalation phase if the sponsor, in consultation with the safety review committee, decides it is necessary to further characterize the optimal dose. However, the study may also proceed directly to the expansion phase. The study population for the Dose Expansion part of the study comprises adults with advanced/metastatic NSCLC with KRAS and/or BRAF mutations, and with Pancreatic Ductal AdenoCarcinoma (PDAC), ColoRectal Cancer (CRC), and Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC) with KRAS, HRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and/or CRAF (RAF1) mutations and alterations. All patients will self-administer S241656 orally in 28-day cycles until disease progression, toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or termination of the study.

Current clinical trials testing the combination of immunotherapy with radiotherapy.

This study evaluates whether the time of day when immunotherapy is given affects clinical outcomes. It includes patients eligible for PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1) or PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) inhibitor treatment who have either advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or locally advanced, resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).The study tests the hypothesis that outcomes differ based on infusion timing (morning versus afternoon). Patients are divided into two cohorts by disease type: Cohort 1 includes NSCLC and Cohort 2 includes HNSCC. Within each cohort, patients are randomly assigned to receive infusions in the morning or afternoon, using a 2:1 ratio for NSCLC and a 1:1 ratio for HNSCC. All treatment and disease assessments follow standard medical care, and outcomes such as survival and treatment response are collected from medical records. Patients will be followed for up to 2 years.

A first in human study to evaluate the safety and preliminary antitumor activity of BBO-8520, a KRAS G12C (ON and OFF) inhibitor, as a single agent and in combination with pembrolizumab and BBO-10203 in subjects with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with a KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma) G12C mutation.

The goal of this observational study is to identify and describe the clinical characteristics, health status, socio-economic impacts and quality of life of patients alive for three years after diagnosis of metastatic Lung cancer and no longer receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. The main question is to identify the needs of these patients in terms of health status (impact of cancer treatments, incidence of new diseases, cardiovascular, diabetes, second cancers), socio-economic aspects, quality of life and return to employment. Participants will be asked to answer quality of life questionnaires at the time of inclusion and 6 and 12 months after inclusion and then, every year up to 5 years in this study. They will be followed regularly, in consultations, according to the usual practices of the physicians in each participating center.

In clinical trials, patients are selected according to strict eligibility criteria (inclusion and exclusion criteria). These criteria aim to ensure homogeneity within the trial population, but may omit patients with specific characteristics, comorbidities or co-medications. Indeed, patients of advanced age, with comorbidities or brain metastases, who are frequently encountered in clinical practice, are often excluded from clinical trials. Real-life data in oncology play a vital role in assessing the efficacy of therapies and therapeutic strategies, complementing data from controlled clinical trials. They make it possible to analyze a larger population and take into account multiple variables such as patient history, co-medications and comorbidities, but also to analyze efficacy and toxicity data in populations not represented in clinical trials. The establishment of a prospective cohort including various stages and histologies will make it possible to set up a platform of available data, including a maximum of data linked to the patient, his tumor and his treatments, collected longitudinally until the patient's death (or the end of the study). In parallel with this cohort, the project aims to set up a longitudinal plasmatheque (from diagnosis to death, or at the end of the study), as well as a tumorotheque (samples systematically stored as part of care by the CHU tumorotheque, and for which patient consent allows their use in research depending on the material available) for patients with available tumor samples. This will enable the construction of ancillary projects to validate research hypotheses, for example concerning the identification of mechanisms of resistance to therapies.

Targeted cancer therapies have a higher therapeutic index than chemotherapy and are prescribed to tens of thousands of patients in France each year. These treatments modify often ubiquitous signaling pathways involved in neuronal synaptic plasticity, the cellular substrate of cognitive and psychiatric functions. Neurocognitive and psychiatric disorders associated with targeted therapies are poorly described and therefore still poorly understood, although they appear to be clinically more severe than chemobrain (neurocognitive disorders related to chemotherapy). The case of patients with metastatic lung cancer with ALK/ROS1 fusion is emblematic. These cancers are treated very effectively with oral targeted therapies inhibiting the tyrosine kinase activity of ALK or ROS1 proteins (ITK-ALK/ROS1), with survival that can exceed 10 years. However, neurocognitive and psychiatric disorders associated with anti-ITK-ALK/ROS1 are reported in 7 to 60% of patients, with a prevalence of about 10% with anti-ITK-ALK/ROS1 brigatinib or alectinib and up to 53% with lorlatinib in industrial therapeutic trials. These disorders appear to be particularly frequent and severe with lorlatinib, including cognitive disorders - especially memory - mood disorders such as anxiety, depression and emotional lability, and psychotic disorders. Current therapeutic trials and care pathways are not designed to take into account these side effects related to anti-ITK-ALK/ROS1. Their incidence is therefore probably underestimated. The DRACONIS project aims to: (1) describe the complaints +/- neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders associated with anti-ITK-ALK/ROS1 through a rigorous neuropsychological and psychiatric evaluation (i.e. patient phenotyping) and (2) understand the experience of complaints +/- neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders associated with anti-ITK-ALK/ROS1 and their consequences on patients' quality of life in a comprehensive approach. The DRACONIS project is part of a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach through the establishment of a partnership between researchers, clinicians and representatives of the anti-ITK-ALK/ROS1 France Cancer du Poumon patient association. The project is notably monitored by a joint scientific committee composed of researchers, clinicians, patients and patient caregivers.

Protocol Title A Study to Evaluate ANS014004 in Combination with EGFR-TKI in Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer The main purpose of this research study is to Find a safe and tolerable dose of two investigational drugs, ANS014004 and PLB1004, when used together. Learn how effective this drug combination is at treating a type of lung cancer called "EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)" that has spread to other parts of the body (locally advanced or metastatic). This study is trying to answer the following questions: Safety \& Dosing: What are the side effects of combining ANS014004 and PLB1004? What is the best dose to use that patients can tolerate well? Effectiveness: Can this combination of drugs help shrink patients' tumors or stop them from growing? Background Information For patients with advanced lung cancer that has a specific gene change called an "EGFR mutation," targeted therapies known as EGFR-TKIs are a standard treatment. While these treatments often work well at first, most tumors eventually stop responding to the drug (this is called "acquired resistance"). The investigational drug ANS014004 is designed to block a protein called MET, which is one of the ways that tumors become resistant to EGFR-TKIs. The researchers believe that by combining ANS014004 with the EGFR-TKI PLB1004, they may be able to prevent or delay resistance, offering patients a more effective and longer-lasting treatment option. How will the study be conducted? This study is divided into two parts: Part 1 (Dose Escalation and Optimization): A small number of participants will receive different dose levels of ANS014004 combined with a fixed dose of PLB1004. The goal is to find the safest and most tolerable dose combination. Part 2 (Phase II Study): Once a recommended dose is identified, more participants will be enrolled to further evaluate how well the drug combination works against the cancer. Throughout the study, participants' health will be closely monitored, and their tumors will be measured regularly using imaging scans (like CT scans) to see how they respond to the treatment.

Patient with histologically proven NSCLC in a metastatic stage, treatment naïve and eligible for first-line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor. Combination with chemotherapy is possible. Presence of a mutation after NGS analysis is required for ctDNA follow-up.

This study is looking at whether patients with cancer that has aggressively spread to the spine can be treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy only and avoid a large spine surgery

SV-101 is intended to overcome the complex and multifactorial nature of the mechanisms mediating tumor immune evasion, by the use of a combination of therapeutic agents that elicit multiple immuno-pharmacologic effects.

This study is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, pilot trial of Bronchoscopic Thermal Vapor Ablation for Lung Cancer (BTVA-C) in patients with primary lung cancer or metastatic cancer in the lung. Patients who have consented to participate in this study (enrolled) will be subject to eligibility screening and baseline assessments, prior to undergoing the BTVA-C procedure. Only patients that meet all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will receive vapor ablation treatment. Patients will be followed for up to 12 months.

Metastases represent the most threatening challenge in cancer. One of the management strategies for patients with Oligometastatic Cancer (OC) is Stereotactic ABlative Radiotherapy (SABR). However, there are few studies, and there is no defined clinical standard, nor are the radiobiological mechanisms that contribute to treatment response well understood. The focus should be on generating evidence to guide the personalization of radiotherapy beyond solely technological and anatomical precision. This could be achieved by recollecting clinical and biological data from patients that undergo this treatment and analyzing them to ultimately predict, with the help of artificial intelligence, which patients will be the most beneficiary and improve their survival rate.

This phase I study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of adaptive pulsed radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors. The primary goal is to assess treatment-related toxicity, while secondary objectives include progression-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life. The study will enroll 32 patients.

Lung cancer is the cancer with the highest morbidity and mortality among men in the world. The proportion of elderly lung cancer patients in the global lung cancer population is steadily increasing, at the same time, it is also the age group with the highest lung cancer mortality, but there is little evidence for treatment of elderly lung cancer patients. In this study, the investigators set the definition of the elderly to 65 years and older. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy were higher than those of chemotherapy alone, which established the dominant position of dual-drug chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Studies showed that elderly patients benefit from immunotherapy. It is controversial whether elderly advanced non-small-cell-lung-cancer (NSCLC) patients should receive single-drug chemotherapy or dual-drug chemotherapy. MILES-3 and MILES-4 studies show that in the advanced NSCLC elderly patients, combined with cisplatin on the basis of single drug chemotherapy can not significantly prolong OS, and can not improve the overall health status of patients. Based on the results of this study, single drug chemotherapy is still the preferred first-line regimen. Another study showed that carboplatin combined with paclitaxel had longer OS than gemcitabine or vinorelbine alone in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC with a performance status (PS) score of less than 2. In the era of immunotherapy, it is not clear whether single-drug chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy can achieve the same therapeutic effect as dual-drug chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of single-drug chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in elderly metastatic NSCLC patients.

Immunotherapy has recently become a main-stream treatment option in cancer care, with improved clinical outcomes in many malignancies, especially that of lung cancer. The long-term benefits of this treatment however are limited. There is therefore a critical need to distinguish predictive biomarkers of response from those of resistance, and to develop synergistic strategies for improved therapeutic response. Strong emerging evidence indicates that the gut microbiome has the ability to influence response to immunotherapy. Unlike tumor genomics, the gut microbiome is modifiable, and thus its modulation to enhance response to immunotherapy is an attractive therapeutic strategy. Working hypothesis: Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) treatment in conjunction with standard (chemo-)immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for metastatic lung cancer enhances disease control rate. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) in altering response to immunotherapy in patients with metastatic lung cancer. The overall goal is to determine microbiome compositional and gene-content changes in patients who respond more efficiently to immunotherapy subsequent to FMT. This understanding may lead to future microbiome-based treatments in combination with immunotherapy to significantly increase lung cancer treatment efficacy. In this prospective clinical and molecular study, we will perform an in-depth analysis of the potential role of FMT in the context of immunotherapy.