Muscular Dystrophy Duchenne

The purpose of this Managed Access Program is to allow access to delpacibart zotadirsen (AOC 1044) for eligible patients diagnosed with DMD mutations amenable to exon 44 skipping. The patient's Administering Physician should follow the suggested treatment guidelines and comply with all local health authority regulations.

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of zeleciment rostudirsen (DYNE-251) administered intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks to ambulatory Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) participants, 4 to 18 years of age, with dystrophin mutations amenable to exon 51 skipping.

Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) is present in the maternal blood from the early first trimester of gestation and makes up 5%-20% of the total circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma. Its presence in maternal plasma has allowed development of noninvasive prenatal diagnosis for single-gene disorders (SGD-NIPD). This can be performed from 9 weeks of amenorrhea and offers an early, safe and accurate definitive diagnosis without the miscarriage risk associated with invasive procedures. One of the major difficulties is distinguishing fetal genotype in the high background of maternal cfDNA, which leads to several technical and analytical challenges. Besides, unlike noninvasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy, NIPD for monogenic diseases represent a smaller market opportunity, and many cases must be provided on a bespoke, patient- or disease-specific basis. As a result, implementation of SGD-NIPD remained sparse, with most testing being delivered in a research setting. The present project aims to take advantage of the unique French collaborative network to make SGD-NIPD possible for theoretically any monogenic disorder and any family.

This is a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal observational cohort study aimed at understanding the progression of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). The primary objective is to identify and integrate key biomarkers from multiple sources-including motor function assessments, body composition (muscle and fat distribution), clinical laboratory tests, and cardiopulmonary imaging-to delineate comprehensive disease trajectories. By analyzing how these factors change over time in a large cohort, the study seeks to develop a robust model that can identify patterns of disease progression. The ultimate goal is to generate evidence that may aid in forecasting individual patient outcomes and inform the future development of personalized rehabilitation and therapeutic strategies.

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effect of a muscle-mimicking, fabric-type shoulder orthosis on functional movements of the upper limb in patients with neuromuscular disorder. The main questions it aims to answer are: * What is the impact of the muscle-mimicking, fabric-type shoulder orthosis on upper limb functional movements in patients with neuromuscular disorder? * Are there observable differences in upper limb function when the shoulder orthosis is worn versus when it is not? Participants will: * Receive education on how to wear and use the shoulder orthosis. * Undergo evaluations, including assessment of upper limb performance, shoulder muscle strength testing, active range of motion measurements, assessment of functional workspace, goal attainment scale evaluation, surface electromyography, physiological measurements such as blood pressure and heart rate, fatigue assessment, and assessment for any musculoskeletal or skin-related issues. Researchers will compare neuromuscular disorder patients before and while wearing and operating the shoulder orthosis to see if there are any significant effects on variables such as upper limb function, range of motion, functional workspace, goal attainment scale, and surface electromyography.

Since 2017, more than 250 analyses performed at the Molecular Genetics Laboratory of the Timone Enfant Hospital have yielded negative results in patients with rare genetic muscle diseases. The researchers hypothesise that some of these misdiagnosed patients carry pathogenic RNA (transcript) disrupting variants that were not identified by DNA sequencing. In fact, DNA sequencing analyses can be negative despite the presence of a pathogenic variant that disrupts RNA splicing or expression, causing a genetic disease. For this reason, RNA sequencing can provide a diagnosis in patients who have not been diagnosed by DNA sequencing, thus putting an end to diagnostic wandering. Thus, as a descriptive prevalence study, the objectives are first to determine the rate of positive diagnoses made by the RNAseq approach in patients with muscle diseases that have not yet been diagnosed, and then to identify the genomic characteristics of the pathogenic variants identified in patients by RNAseq analysis, in order to facilitate the identification of this type of variant in future patients. 50 patients will be included in this study during 2 years.

The study includes 150 patients with DMD diagnosis confirmed by genetic testing, 8-16 years old (≥8 and \<17) at the study entry with a follow-up of up to 5 years. Random enrollment of a patient to one of two groups (intervention or control) takes place after pre-screening and screening stage starts the first phase of the trial. To be eligible for participation in the study, patients must receive standard of care cardiac therapy, which is an Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) for at least one-month prior to enrollment. A major part of the trial is equal for all patients - who will be receiving indistinguishable investigational medicinal products (IMPs), the drug metoprolol succinate or placebo. As a part of the clinical trial, diagnostic examinations evaluating progression of the disease, will be performed periodically. In addition, all patients will be monitored at home. Heart rate, blood pressure and patients' personal well-being will be controlled using telemedicine technologies. Additional visits in the research center will be provided if any adverse events occur. This model will be continued for 30 months from the enrollment of a first patient. After this period the first drug efficiency analysis will be performed. After that, the intervention may be continued or in case of negative impact of the intervention on patients' health and well-being, terminated with further patients monitoring.