Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma

This phase II trial compares the use of pembrolizumab and radiation therapy to chemotherapy with cisplatin, gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil or mitomycin-C and radiation therapy for the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Chemotherapy drugs, such as cisplatin, gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil or mitomycin-C, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays, particles, or radioactive seeds to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. Giving pembrolizumab with radiation may kill more tumor cells than chemotherapy with radiation therapy in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

This phase I trial evaluates the effects of bicalutamide, compared to no study drug (NSD), on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Bicalutamide is in a class of medications called androgen receptor inhibitors. It works by blocking the effects of androgen (a male reproductive hormone) to stop the growth and spread of tumor cells. Previous studies have suggested that expression of a protein called EGFR on tumor cells is related to bladder cancer disease progression. This trial may help doctors evaluate if bicalutamide has any effect on EGFR expression in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

The main objectives of this study are to determine the feasibility and safety of Belzupacap Sarotalocan (AU-011, bel-sar) treatment of bladder cancer utilizing focal injections with or without laser application.

This is a phase 2 open-label two cohort study of durvalumab plus monalizumab in patients with BCG-unresponsive or BCG-exposed CIS NMIBC. Arm A will enroll 43 participants who have cancer in situ (CIS) with or without high grade papillary urothelial cancer. Arm B will enroll 17 participants who do not have cancer in situ (CIS) but do have high grade papillary urothelial cancer. Eligible patients will be enrolled to receive up to 13 cycles of monthly combination of monalizumab and durvalumab. Both monalizumab and durvalumab will be administered intravenously (IV) every 28 days.

Background: In European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines, the vast majority of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers (NMIBCs) undergo a primary transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by a repeat TURBT (Re-TURBT). The Re-TURBT is recommended due to the possibility of residual bladder cancer but is unnecessary in many cases by constituting overtreatment. Currently, no diagnostic strategy or predictive tools have been implemented to further stratify who does or does not benefit from Re-TURBT. Recently, an MRI-based Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) score has been developed to stage as to the preoperative probability of muscle invasion, which could potentially exclude those who do not require a Re-TURBT when a primary high-quality resection is delivered. As such, performing TURBT with standard white light (WL) cystoscopy is known to miss many bladder tumours, which may be poorly visible, and a technique known as with photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) results in lower residual tumor and lower early intravesical recurrence rates. PDD is performed using violet light to improve the detection of these lesions not easily visible with WL cystoscopy. Methods/Aims: The investigators propose an Italian, single-center, phase IV, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial, in which participants (n=112) who had already received a mpMRI/VI-RADS score, are randomized to receive PDD-TURBT, no Re-TURBT versus standard of care represented by conventional WL-TURBT followed by WL-Re-TURBT. The primary outcome is proportions of early recurrence in the urinary bladder. Secondary outcomes will include proportions of late BCa recurrence, late disease-free interval, time to progression to MIBC, patient's quality of life assessment, and cost-analysis. Perspective: The CUT-less trial aims to respond to this unmet need through a non-inferiority randomized clinical study potentially shaping the perspective for a paradigm shift towards a more personalized, socially, and economically sustainable updated NMIBC therapeutic pathway. Implications: The current clinical trial proposal is aiming to achieve a paradigm shift in the oncological and socio-economical management of urothelial malignancies of the urinary bladder. Our first concern is indeed to guarantee a safe and ground-breaking strategy to manage the pathway of such patients in order to guarantee the non-inferior oncologic safety (and possibly superiority) when compared to the current standard of care. Additionally, if our hypotheses are confirmed, the investigators will be able to significantly relieve these patients from the oncologic burden of an already invasive and arduous bladder cancer care path. Finally, safely avoiding an unnecessary, expensive surgical procedure will bring significant social and economic benefits to the EU healthcare system and possibly worldwide.

This trial aims at investigating the diagnostic ability of a combined diagnostic panel including systematic endoscopic evaluation (SEE), blood-based ctDNA assay, and urine-based cfDNA assay to predict the presence of residual tumor remaining in the bladder at cystectomy. Patients who are planned for cystectomy due to bladder cancer will be considered for enrollment based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.

This study is being conducted to establish a novel tumor tissue- and blood-based biomarker test to assess early systemic and local response to immunomodulation by BCG immunotherapy in patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Responses will be compared between patients with high-risk NMIBC who are being treated with standard of care BCG therapy and those treated with combination chemotherapy. Local and systemic immune monitoring assays will allow early identification of patients who will not benefit from BCG immunotherapy.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn the dose-limiting toxicity of the new combined treatment with irinotecan liposomes (intravenous injection) and epirubicin (intravesical instillation) in anthracyclines treatment-failed non-muscle invasive bladder cancer adults. It will also learn if the combined treatment works to treat these patients. Additionally, the safety and biological mechanisms of the combined treatment will also be explored. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the combined treatment of irinotecan liposomes and epirubicin reverse anthracyclines resistance of participants? * What medical problems do participants have after taking the combined treatment of irinotecan liposomes and epirubicin? * What biological mechanisms underlie the effect of irinotecan liposomes on anthracyclines resistance? Participants will be classified into Arm A and Arm B. * Arm A: Participants will receive an intravenous injection of irinotecan liposomes once every two weeks for one month, along with intravesical instillation of epirubicin once a week for one month. Patients will be evaluated by two professional urologists; those with a complete response or partial response will undergo transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and intravesical therapy. Patients with stable or progressive disease will receive subsequent treatment at the investigator's discretion. Participants are required to visit the hospital for physical examination every two weeks. * Arm B: In the first month after TURBT surgery, participants will receive intravenous injection of irinotecan liposomes once every two weeks for one month, and intravesical instillation of epirubicin once a week for one month, followed by once a month for six months. Participants are required to visit the clinic for physical examination once every two weeks in the first month, and once every three months after that. * Keep a diary of their symptoms during the study period.

A database has been created and will be used in which data will be collected in electronic format relating to adult patients who underwent one of the following endoscopic resection surgeries: TURBK, MAPPING, TURBK SECOND LOOK, BLADDER BIOPSIES.