Oral Cancer

This study is being done to determine whether adding a proactive tongue strengthening exercise program using a biofeedback device (the Tongueometer) improves speech and swallowing outcomes after surgery for tongue cancer. Patients who undergo partial or hemiglossectomy often experience difficulties with speech and swallowing, which can significantly impact their quality of life. While speech and swallow therapy is typically provided in response to problems, this study investigates whether introducing structured tongue strengthening exercises with biofeedback early-can lead to better long-term outcomes. This research will help establish whether this approach should become part of standard post-operative care.

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of a newly developed artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted physiotherapy system for oromandibular and neck-shoulder range of motion (ROM) in patients who have undergone treatment for oral cancer. In this single-group, prospective, non-randomized pilot study, recruited participants will receive 4 to 6 weeks of AI-assisted physiotherapy. Participants will undergo a comprehensive clinical evaluation at baseline and post-intervention. During the intervention period, the AI system will perform a daily automated assessment to dynamically generate and adjust personalized exercise programs. Participants will perform these prescribed programs 4 to 6 times daily. Pre- and post-intervention changes, along with key feasibility parameters, acceptability, and safety metrics, will be statistically analyzed to inform future definitive trials.

The goal of this phase II single arm clinical study is to evaluate the effect of antibiotics (metronidazole) and oral chlorhexidine (CHX) in reducing the bacteria load within tumors of patients undergoing surgery for oral cancer.

Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP), where 3D modeling is used to create 3D-printed surgical guides, has been shown to improve outcomes for patients who undergo mandibular reconstruction surgery, usually due to invasion of cancer from the oral cavity to the jaw. This trial will directly compare the outcomes of patients who receive VSP versus patients who receive the current standard of care, which is Free-Hand Surgery (FHS). They will be randomized into either treatment at a 1:1 ratio and bony union rates will be compared between 12-month postoperative CT scans for each treatment group. Secondary objectives include comparing other short and long-term complication rates, reconstruction accuracy, quality of life, and functional outcomes of VSP and FHS. An economic analysis of VSP will also be performed.

The study design is an observational cohort study of patients undergoing standard of care oral cavity reconstruction. An observational study is required to prospectively evaluate microbial and antibiotic mechanisms underlying surgical site infection after oral cavity reconstruction.

The study aims to assess the hardness of masticatory muscles in post-surgical oral cancer patients using strain elastography ultrasound, calculating the masseter elasticity index and exploring its association with maximum interincisal mouth opening. Furthermore, the study incorporates exercise training to analyze whether changes in masseter hardness can serve as an objective indicator for predicting the improvement of trismus.

The purpose of this study is to test the safety and effectiveness of using brodalumab in patients who develop side effects from cancer immune therapy. Immune-related side effects are due to activation of the immune system in patients who previously received immunotherapy and the goal of this study is to help better control these side effects. Brodalumab is often used to treat patients with autoimmune diseases (diseases where the immune system is activated against normal organs) and safe doses and treatment schedules have been determined in these patients. Immune-related side effects appear to closely mirror these autoimmune conditions. Brodalumab has not been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in immunotherapy side effects but it has been approved for treatment of autoimmune conditions.

The goal of this clinical trial is to improve the surgical treatment of patients with oral cancer. We will explore whether the use of surgeon performed ultrasound during these surgeries result in better tumor removal. We hypothesize that using intraoperative ultrasound to assist the resection results in more frequent clear surgical margins in oral cancer surgeries compared to standard methods. This improvement is associated with a reduced need for post-operative adjuvant therapies such as radiotherapy and reoperation, lower mortality rates, lower cancer recurrence, and enhanced quality of life for patients undergoing surgery for oral cancer. Participants will be randomized to either the control or intervention group: * Control group will receive standard treatment for oral cancer. * Intervention group will in addition to the standard treatment have surgery performed using ultrasound to guide the resection and evaluate resection margins intraoperatively. Outcomes: * Number of free surgical margins between control and intervention group. * Intraoperative surgeon assessed surgical margins compared to final histology report. * Dysphagia and quality of life questionnaires. * Recurrence rates. * Mortality rates. All participant will be followed-up at 3 months and 12 months with: * MDADI dysphagia questionnaire * EORTC head and neck cancer quality of life questionnaire * Follow-up on recurrrence and mortality.

To evaluate the impact of AI-powered chatbot interactions versus traditional educational handouts on increasing participants' knowledge of oral cancer and its prevention

This study will fill a scientific gap in the current knowledge providing data for evaluation of the palatal augmentation prosthesis (PAP) as a therapeutic modality post-surgery. This is a robust scientific randomized prospective clinical trial. Positive outcomes from this study have the potential to dramatically alter the most common issues of oral cancer therapy, namely speech and swallowing functions. Patients will have been diagnosed with a cancer lesion of the tongue requiring surgery and removal of part of the tongue. Smaller cancers of the tongue are sized as T1 or T2. For patients with smaller lesions, a PAP, which can aid in speaking and swallowing, is not routinely provided.

The goal of this clinical trial is to develop and evaluate an Artificial Intelligence Assisted Prehabilitation Program (AI APP) for returning to work and cost-effectiveness analysis in patients with oral cancer (OC). The main questions it aims to answer are: * What kinds of needs are related to returning to work (RTW) in patients with OC from diagnosis to survival that we can incorporate into the development of AI APP to assist this population ? * How is the effect of the AI APP that based on findings from the first question for patients with OC on physical and psychological distress, fear of recurrence, self-efficacy in coping with cancer, communication, motor function, quality of life, and RTW? * How is the effect of the RTW AI prediction model to identify high-risk groups ? And how is the comprehensive cost effectiveness of benefits and quality of life of the AI APP for OC population? Researchers will compare patients without using AI APP to see if the AI APP works to assist with coping physical and psychological distress, communication, motor function, quality of life, and RTW issues for individuals with OC? Participants will: * Be asked to fulfill a structural questionnaire, or engage in a semi-structured one-by-one interview or a focus group to assess their physical, psychological, and social support needs in the first stage. * Be invited to participant the pilot testing of AI APP in the second stage. * Be provided and trained by 3-month AI APP for 3 months or cared as usual in the third stage. * Complete a structural questionnaire and follow up one year, including the baseline (before using the AI app) and at 1-2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months after the baseline. * Engage in one-by-one interview or a focus group to assess user experiences of the AI APP.

Cancers of the oral cavity (lip, oral tongue, gingivae, floor of mouth, hard palate, and other mouth tissues including buccal mucosa) are amongst the most common worldwide, with an estimated annual burden of over 300,000 incident cases. Most oral cancers (\>75%) are attributable to cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking, and chewing of areca nut/betel quid with or without tobacco, and very few are related to human papillomavirus infection. Oral cancer incidence geographically tracks with the prevalence of these risk factors and is notably high in the Indian subcontinent (due to tobacco chewing and smoking) and southeast Asia (due to betel quid chewing without tobacco and smoking). The current standard for screening for oral precancer/cancer is visual and tactile examination by an expert for the presence of clinical/visual lesions (leukoplakia, erythroplakia, and oral submucous fibrosis). Such visually identified lesions are further triaged based on clinical impression for a biopsy to determine histopathologic presence/grade of dysplasia. Several observations point to key limitations of oral cancer screening based on clinical impression-based biopsy of visually identified lesions, including the decision to biopsy a lesion, which lesion to biopsy, and where within the lesion to direct a biopsy. Thus, there is a need for tools for improved triage of visual precancers for biopsy and targeting areas for biopsy within a lesion for more effective risk stratification and better provision of care. Two non-invasive methods hold promise for triage of lesions for biopsy-oral liquid-based cytology and high-resolution microendoscopy (HRME). Oral cytology provides a method to non-invasively sample visible oral lesions and holds promise to enable triage of lesions for biopsy. HRME utilizes optical fiber-based imaging in combination with the fluorescent contrast agent proflavine to image sub-cellular features in vivo in lesions/epithelial tissues, functionally an in situ biopsy. The investigators propose to conduct a cross-sectional study to evaluate the clinical utility of these two non-invasive methods for detecting oral precancer and early oral cavity cancer- the performance of oral cytology and HRME as an adjunct for triage of visible lesions for biopsy and the performance of HRME as an adjunct to enable better within-lesion targeting of areas for biopsy. If successful, this study would facilitate the development of a non-invasive, 3-step algorithm for oral cancer screening: identification of lesions through visual inspection, triage for biopsy through cytology or HRME, and targeted within-lesion biopsy (if needed) through HRME.

Investigators will employ serial assessments of tissue biopsy and additional biomarkers that reflect burden of disease and predict treatment response. Patients enrolled on this study will be given the option to provide biological samples before, during, and after treatment, as well as functional outcomes of treatment response. These samples will be utilized to develop and validate prognostic and predictive biomarkers for patients undergoing targeted therapy, immunotherapy, surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy.

This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of a novel AI-based physiotherapy evaluation system for measuring oromandibular and neck-shoulder range of motion (ROM). Traditional ROM assessments rely on manual measurements, which may be influenced by rater experience and variability. The proposed AI system uses automated keypoint tracking to provide objective and standardized measurements. In this cross-sectional study, healthy adult participants will perform standardized ROM tasks. Measurements obtained from the AI system will be compared with those from two independent raters using conventional clinical tools. Repeated measurements will be conducted to assess intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. The agreement between the AI system and human raters will be evaluated to determine the system's clinical applicability.

This study examines the effects of AI-based physiotherapy on oral function, shoulder function, whole-body physical function, and quality of life in oral cancer patients. One hundred patients will be recruited before surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy and randomly assigned to an experimental group receiving 12 weeks of AI-guided physiotherapy or a control group receiving usual care. Both groups will perform jaw, neck, and shoulder exercises, with the experimental group using a mobile app to monitor progress. Assessments at baseline, pre-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention will measure maximal in the maximum interincisal opening (MIO), joint range of motion (ROM), pain, endurance (e.g., 6-minute walk test), upper extremity function, and quality of life.

The objective of this exploratory clinical trial is to apply Unreal Engine 5 (UE5)-based Mixed Reality (MR) technology to achieve real-time stereoscopic visualization of surgical planning, personalized free flap harvest and defect reconstruction, accurate oral cancer resection, and precise morphological and volumetric matching of the reconstructed free flap to the defect site. Researchers adopted a parallel controlled design, with participants randomized into three groups: Experimental Group 1 (undergoing Mixed Reality \[MR\] technology-assisted surgery), Experimental Group 2 (undergoing virtual surgical guide-assisted surgery), and Control Group (undergoing conventional surgery). A total of 30 participants will be recruited, with 10 cases in each group. The primary purpose is to confirm the effectiveness of MR technology in assisting oral cancer resection, free flap design, harvest, and defect reconstruction. Allocation concealment will be implemented via the sealed envelope method.

The primary goal of this study is to see if photodynamic therapy (PDT) is effective for treatment of lesions in the oral cavity which have high risk of becoming oral cancer. PDT treatment uses a drug, called a photosensitizer, which makes the diseased cells become light-sensitive such that they are destroyed when laser light is delivered to the target lesion. In this study a new handheld device, called SITOS (a "Screen, Image and Treat Optical System), is used. The ability of this device to simultaneously visualize the inside of the mouth and deliver laser light to the target site will be evaluated. The main questions this study seeks to answer are: * Can this treatment completely cure oral potentially malignant lesions (OPML) without need for surgery? * Do lesions recur after PDT treatment? * Is the SITOS device easy to use for the doctor and comfortable for the patient, both as an oral imaging device and as a treatment device?

This study aims to determine whether dysbiosis actively contributes to HNSCC and if so, the underlying molecular mechanisms.

This observational study aims to develop an AI-based system for tracking mandibular and shoulder movements using deep learning techniques. It will compare AI-generated pose estimations with gold standard measurements to assess accuracy, particularly in patients with functional impairments from oral cancer treatment, such as trismus, spinal accessory nerve dysfunction, neck dystonia, and radiation fibrosis.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy, prior to radical surgery, in enhancing the 2-year event-free survival rate and overall survival rate in patients diagnosed with locally advanced oral or HPV-unrelated oropharyngeal cancer.

Background: Oral cancer radical surgery often requires free flap reconstruction. Postoperative pain is severe, and traditional opioids like sufentanil have side effects and may adversely affect tumor biology. Dezocine and nalbuphine are opioid agonist-antagonists with potentially better safety profiles. Their comparative effects on analgesia, complications, and flap survival in oral cancer surgery are unknown. Objective: To compare the efficacy of dezocine versus nalbuphine, both combined with sufentanil, for postoperative analgesia, and to evaluate their impact on postoperative complications and free flap survival/function in patients undergoing oral cancer radical surgery with flap reconstruction. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Sixty eligible patients (aged 18-70, ASA I-III) will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with either Sufentanil + Dezocine or Sufentanil + Nalbuphine. The primary outcome is pain intensity assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include flap survival status, sensory function recovery, incidence of adverse events (e.g., nausea, vomiting), and hospitalization duration. Potential Impact: This study may identify a superior postoperative analgesic regimen that provides effective pain relief while potentially improving flap outcomes and minimizing side effects for oral cancer patients.

This study employs a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design. Patients diagnosed with oral cancer by the attending physician and who meet the inclusion criteria will be admitted to the study after receiving a full explanation of the study objectives, intervention methods, potential risks, and participant rights from the research team upon their stable transfer to the plastic surgery ward post-operation. Written consent will be obtained from the patient and/or their legally authorized representative after adequate informed consent has been provided, before they are enrolled in the study.

This study aims to examine the effects of a swallowing care program combined with an exercise mobile application (App) on swallowing function, anxiety, and quality of life in patients with oral cancer after flap reconstruction surgery. The goal is to determine whether integrating App-based swallowing exercises into postoperative care can improve rehabilitation outcomes compared with conventional care alone. A purposive sampling method will be used to recruit 72 participants from the surgical wards of a medical center in northern Taiwan. Eligible patients scheduled for oral cancer tumor resection and flap reconstruction will be identified through consultation with plastic surgeons. After screening and informed consent, participants will be assigned to a control group or an experimental group, with approximately 36 patients in each group. The control group will receive routine ward education and standard postoperative nursing care, while the experimental group will receive the same care plus an additional intervention using a swallowing exercise App. The intervention will begin on postoperative day 7, guided by the researcher. Follow-up assessments will be conducted during outpatient visits at postoperative week 4 and week 12. To minimize potential interference between participants, data collection will be performed sequentially-first for the control group, followed by the experimental group. Data will be collected through self-administered questionnaires or researcher-assisted interviews, including a demographic survey, the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction-10 (POD-10), the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), a Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety, and the EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 questionnaire for quality of life. Each assessment will take approximately 20-30 minutes. Participants may withdraw from the study at any time without penalty. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize participant characteristics. The chi-square test and independent t-test will be used to examine group homogeneity. Paired t-tests will be applied to evaluate within-group changes in swallowing function, anxiety, and quality of life before and after the intervention. The results of this study are expected to provide empirical evidence on the effectiveness of App-assisted swallowing rehabilitation for patients with oral cancer following reconstructive surgery, supporting the development of innovative, technology-based postoperative care models.

The aim 1 of this trial is the development of the Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) definition of oral cancer minimal residual disease (MRD), and aim 2 is a prospective trial of oral cancer treatment. If this trial is successful, it is expected that it may be able to provide a standard diagnostic tool (MRD in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OCSCC)) and treatment mode (extended adjuvant chemotherapy with low-dose oral chemotherapy). The survival rate of patients will be improved.

This follow-up clinical study aims to evaluate the sustained effects of two rehabilitation programs (AI-based physiotherapy vs. conventional physiotherapy) for oral cancer patients. Participants who completed the original intervention trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: 202411044RINC) will be assessed at 3 and 9 months post-intervention. Outcomes include mandibular mobility, shoulder joint range of motion, functional performance, quality of life, pain, and return-to-work status.