Ostracism

Study Design This study was designed as a comparative, cross-sectional case-control study examining the effect of comorbid alcohol and substance use disorder (ASUD) on clinical course and social inclusion among individuals with severe mental illness followed at a Community Mental Health Center (CMHC). The study did not involve any interventions. Aim The aim of this study is to examine the effect of comorbid alcohol and substance use on clinical course parameters-such as number of hospitalizations and medication dosages-and on social inclusion indicators-such as employment, social participation, and social adjustment-among individuals with severe mental illness followed at the CMHC, in comparison with a matched control group without substance use. Research Questions What are the rates of comorbid alcohol and substance use among patients with severe mental illness followed at the CMHC? What are the current addiction symptoms, number of hospitalizations, and employment rates among individuals with severe mental illness and comorbid ASUD? What is the level of continuity of CMHC engagement and social participation among individuals with severe mental illness and comorbid ASUD, and what factors influence it? How does the level of social inclusion among individuals with severe mental illness and comorbid ASUD compare with that of individuals without ASUD? Hypotheses H1: The average annual number of hospitalizations among individuals with a dual diagnosis (severe mental illness + ASUD) followed at the CMHC is significantly higher than among those without substance use. H2: Among individuals with a dual diagnosis, the daily medication doses (e.g., chlorpromazine equivalents) required to control psychotic or manic symptoms are higher than in the control group. H3: Social inclusion is lower among patients with substance use compared with the control group. H4: Employment rates among individuals with a dual diagnosis are significantly lower than among those with severe mental illness alone. H5: Substance use negatively affects patients' social participation, including involvement in activities and friendships. H6: Attendance rates at CMHC workshops and rehabilitation programs are lower among individuals with substance use compared with the control group.

During the first funding period (1st FP) we investigated the impact of acute and chronic stress (Trier Social Stress Test, TSST) on Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT). Moreover, we developed a novel full transfer task that allows assessing both general and specific PIT to investigate whether specific PIT differs between alcohol use disorder (AUD) and control subjects. We found that our online version of TSST induced stress and thereby amplified PIT effects in participants. Preliminary analyses of the full transfer task indicate that AUD participants exhibit a stronger specific PIT effect compared to controls. Based on these findings, we want to assess the following aim for this study: Investigate the effect of experimentally induced social exclusion on alcohol-specific and general PIT effects in AUD and control participants.

The goal of this experimental study is to learn about the effects of ostracism and concealment among adult smokers. The main aims are: 1. Determine the causal consequences of gendered stigmatization. Specifically, do women react more strongly than men to exclusion (as opposed to inclusion) especially when their gender is revealed (as opposed to concealed) for outcomes such as smoking stigma, stress, cognitive depletion, smoking attitudes, and smoking cessation intentions (Study 3)? 2. Examine the moderating roles of cultural context. Specifically, contrasting the cultural context in the US and Denmark (where gender norms are more egalitarian) do Danish smokers show fewer gender differences than US smokers in how they describe and react to their smoking stigmatization experiences (Study 1, 2, and 3)?