Tace

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a high-mortality global malignancy with a heavy disease burden in China. Although curative surgical resection improves survival for early-stage HCC patients, the 5-year postoperative recurrence rate remains as high as 50%-70%. Postoperative adjuvant TACE and systemic TKIs are standard treatments for high-risk HCC, yet both therapies have prominent drawbacks, including limited response rates, unavoidable toxicities, and inconsistent clinical benefits. Current treatment decisions rely on conventional clinical and pathological features without precise biomarkers, leading to inadequate individualized therapy and wasted medical resources. Tumor immune microenvironment and multimodal imaging-pathological features critically determine HCC treatment sensitivity. Artificial intelligence and deep learning based on preoperative radiomics and postoperative H\&E whole-slide imaging (WSI) can capture hidden tumor biological characteristics and predict therapeutic responses. However, no validated multimodal AI model is available for predicting postoperative TACE and TKI treatment outcomes in HCC, lacking large-scale multicenter prospective evidence. This study aims to construct and validate a multimodal deep learning model integrating preoperative contrast-enhanced CT/MRI, postoperative WSI, pathological reports, and clinical data, to precisely identify HCC patients sensitive to postoperative adjuvant TACE or TKI therapy and optimize individualized treatment strategies. This is a hybrid retrospective-training and prospective observational multicenter study with no clinical intervention. A total of 10,000 retrospective HCC surgical patients will be enrolled to develop an AI classification model for predicting responses to four postoperative treatment strategies: surgery alone, surgery plus TACE, surgery plus TACE combined with systemic therapy, and surgery plus exclusive systemic therapy. Subsequently, 1,000 eligible postoperative HCC patients will be prospectively and consecutively enrolled from 10-15 centers. The AI model will generate adjuvant therapy predictions without interfering with real clinical decisions. Patients will be divided into prediction-consistent and prediction-inconsistent cohorts based on the match between model predictions and actual treatments. Long-term follow-up will be performed to compare prognostic outcomes and validate the model's real-world performance and stability. Key inclusion criteria: histopathologically confirmed HCC; aged 18-75 years; received R0 curative resection; available qualified H\&E-stained FFPE slides for digital scanning; complete clinical, pathological and follow-up data; high-quality preoperative contrast-enhanced CT/MRI images eligible for AI analysis. Key exclusion criteria: prior preoperative anti-tumor therapy with unavailable baseline data; concurrent other primary malignancies; non-R0 resection; unqualified pathological slides or imaging data; severe missing clinical or follow-up information.

This is a Phase 3, open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization (cTACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is beyond the Milan criteria and who have previously undergone a Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) procedure. The TIPS procedure is commonly performed to manage complications of portal hypertension, such as variceal bleeding or refractory ascites, in patients with cirrhosis. However, after TIPS, treatment options for HCC-particularly in cases exceeding the Milan criteria-remain limited and not well-defined in current guidelines. While TACE is a standard locoregional therapy for intermediate-stage HCC, its application in patients with a prior TIPS is controversial due to altered hepatic hemodynamics, which may increase the risk of liver toxicity and compromise treatment safety and efficacy. Preliminary retrospective data suggest that DEB-TACE, which uses calibrated drug-eluting microspheres, may offer a safer and more effective alternative to cTACE in this specific patient population by providing more controlled drug delivery and potentially reducing systemic and hepatic toxicity. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether DEB-TACE improves Overall Survival (OS) compared to cTACE in patients with beyond-Milan HCC after TIPS. Secondary objectives include comparing the safety profile, Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), and Quality of Life (QoL) between the two treatment arms. The study aims to enroll 206 participants who will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either DEB-TACE or cTACE. The trial will include a 24-month recruitment period and a 24-month treatment and follow-up phase, with a total study duration of 48 months. By directly comparing these two TACE approaches in a prospectively defined and randomized setting, this study seeks to provide high-level evidence to guide the optimal locoregional treatment strategy for HCC patients with a history of TIPS placement.

This study evaluates H101 combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) to enhance local tumor killing and immune activation while minimizing toxicity in r/m HNSCC patients.

This study is an open-label, randomized controlled, multicenter, phase III clinical trial

Study Objectives： Atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1; anti-PD-L1) combined with bevacizumab (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor; anti-VEGF) or Durvalumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1; anti-PD-L1) combined with tremelimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4; anti-CTLA4) have recently been established as a standard first-line systemic treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its objective response rate (ORR) is only less than 27% (1, 2), and the majority of patients died of HCC progression and liver failure. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a novel combination treatment strategy to overcome resistance to immunotherapy and improve patient outcomes. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains the standard treatment for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (3, 4). However, in our previous retrospective study (5-7), the investigators consistently observed that this combination not only improves therapeutic responses but also significantly prolongs patient survival. The tumor necrosis caused by TACE may enhance the efficacy of systemic therapies by promoting the release of neoantigens, thereby stimulating immune responses (8-14). This concept has been substantiated in two recent trials involving intermediate-stage HCC (15, 16), where the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to TACE resulted in improved clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, this promising approach has yet to replace the decades-old standard treatment protocols, underscoring the need for further proof-of-concept studies. Both immunotherapy (atezolizumab/bevacizumab or durvalumab/tremelimumab) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are approved treatment modalities for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by the U.S. and Taiwan Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This phase II non-randomized trial is designed to prospectively evaluate the therapeutic efficacy, safety, and immunological responses in patients with unresectable HCC treated with a combination of immunotherapy and TACE. A particular focus of this study is to explore the potential immune-boosting effects of TACE, including its ability to enhance antigen presentation and stimulate anti-tumor immune responses.

This is a single-arm, multicenter, exploratory clinical study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab Injection and Bevacizumab Injection in patients with unresectable, non-metastatic HCC. The primary endpoint is PFS as assessed by the investigator based on RECIST v1.1 criteria.

This is a monocenter, single-arm, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lenvatinib combined with Tislelizumab and TACE applied as neoadjuvant regimen for the patients of CNLC stage IB and IIA hepatocellular carcinoma with high risk of recurrence Primary outcome: Major pathological response (MPR) Secondary outcomes: pathological complete response (pCR), R0 resection rate, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), treatment-related adverse events (TRAE)

Liver abscess is a rare but serious complication of hepatocellular carcinoma after TACE, with an incidence of less than 1% reported in previous literature. Studies have shown that history of biliary tract disease, tumor size, embolization materials and embolization endpoint selection may be related to the occurrence of abscess. In recent years, with the wide application of targeted and immune drugs, there have been reports of multiple cases of liver abscess after single target immunotherapy for liver cancer, and there have also been studies showing that TACE combined with targeted immunotherapy can significantly increase the degree of liquefaction necrosis and increase the risk of liver abscess. However, these studies are single-center reports with small sample size and low level of evidence. Therefore, it is of great clinical significance to explore the risk factors of liver abscess after TACE and build a prediction model by using multi-center and large sample data. The formation of liver abscess after TACE means a large range of tissue liquefaction necrosis. There are reports of high incidence of early recurrence and metastasis of liquefaction necrosis. Some studies also show that tumor necrosis is more complete when liver abscess is combined with complete remission. In previous studies, ORR in patients with liver cancer complicated with liver abscess ranged from 18.75%-100%, with significant differences in reports from different centers. The effect of specific abscess formation on TACE efficacy of liver cancer remains to be determined. Therefore, the second research focus of this project is to explore the effect of liver abscess formation after TACE on prognosis of liver cancer.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with adebrelimab and bevacizumab transformation in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma