Telemedecine

2

Review clinical trials related to Telemedecine. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Recruiting

Health Ahead Comparative Effectiveness Study

The Health Ahead Comparative Effectiveness Study is a pragmatic, parallel-arm interventional platform that systematically compares successive changes to preventive health screening - each isolated as a single variable against current practice - on the path toward a fully automated screening system deployable in any environment, including the most isolated and resource-limited communities. Each comparison is evaluated with a common set of engagement, behavior-change, experience, cost, and longitudinal outcome measures, allowing results to accumulate on a consistent yardstick across the life of the platform. The first comparison evaluates static versus interactive personalized health report delivery. Subsequent pre-planned comparisons, added by protocol amendment, evaluate mobile community versus fixed laboratory screening; and a hybrid medical-droid plus human-delivery model versus human-only screening. All participants are simultaneously enrolled in the 100-Year Human Aging Study and the Human Observatory Study, contributing individual longitudinal and population-level causal inference data through those protocols.

Participants needed: 1,000,000
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: William Brandenburg, MDUpdated: Jun 25, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Age 18 years or older [+2]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Remote App-based Rehabilitation After Rotator Cuff Repair

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile application for telemedicine in patients recovering from arthroscopic rotator cuff tendon repair. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a test group using a mobile application for exercise guidance and monitoring, or a control group receiving standard paper-based exercise instructions. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation, treatment adherence, cost savings, and patient satisfaction between the two methods over a 6-month follow-up period.

Participants needed: 102
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Hanoi Medical UniversityUpdated: Apr 29, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Demographics: Individuals aged 18 years or older. [+9]

Pre-existing or concomitant upper extremity dysfunction unrelated to the rotator... [+4]